A review of adherence and predictors of adherence to the CONSORT Statement in the reporting of tuberculosis vaccine trials
| dc.contributor.author | Ngah, Veranyuy D. | en_ZA |
| dc.contributor.author | Mazingisa, Akhona V. | en_ZA |
| dc.contributor.author | Zunza, Moleen | en_ZA |
| dc.contributor.author | Wiysonge, Charles S. | en_ZA |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-29T07:53:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-03-29T07:53:24Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-12-16 | |
| dc.description | CITATION: Ngah, V. D. et al. 2020. A review of adherence and predictors of adherence to the CONSORT Statement in the reporting of tuberculosis vaccine trials. Vaccines, 8(4):770, doi:10.3390/vaccines8040770. | |
| dc.description | The original publication is available at https://www.mdpi.com | |
| dc.description.abstract | The statement on Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) ensures transparency in the reporting of randomized trials. However, it is unclear if the statement has led to improvement in the quality of reporting of tuberculosis (TB) vaccine trials. We explored the quality of reporting of TB vaccine trials according to the latest version of the CONSORT statement, released in 2010. We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in August 2019. We conducted screening, study selection, and data extraction in duplicate; and resolved differences through discussion. We assessed reporting to be adequate if trials reported at least 75% of the CONSORT 2010 items. We conducted a trend analysis to assess if there was improvement in reporting over time. We also used logistic regression to assess factors associated with adequate reporting. We included 124 trials in the analyses. The mean proportion of adherence was 67.3% (95% confidence interval 64.4% to 70.1%), with only 46 (37%) trials having adequate reporting. There was a significant improvement in the quality of reporting over time (p < 0.0001). Trials published in journals with impact factors between 10 and 20 were more likely to have adequate reporting (odds ratio 9.4; 95% confidence interval 1.30 to 67.8), compared to lower-impact-factor journals. Despite advances over time, the reporting of TB vaccine trials is still inadequate and requires improvement. | en_ZA |
| dc.description.uri | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/8/4/770 | |
| dc.description.version | Publisher's version | |
| dc.format.extent | 13 pages ; illustrations | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ngah, V. D. et al. 2020. A review of adherence and predictors of adherence to the CONSORT Statement in the reporting of tuberculosis vaccine trials. Vaccines, 8(4):770, doi:10.3390/vaccines8040770. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2076-393X (online) | |
| dc.identifier.other | doi:10.3390/vaccines8040770 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/109719 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_ZA | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | |
| dc.rights.holder | Authors retain copyright | |
| dc.subject | Tuberculosis -- Vaccination | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Clinical trials -- Reporting | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) | en_ZA |
| dc.title | A review of adherence and predictors of adherence to the CONSORT Statement in the reporting of tuberculosis vaccine trials | en_ZA |
| dc.type | Article | en_ZA |