The effects of judicial campaign activity on the legitimacy of courts: A survey-based experiment

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGibson J.L.
dc.contributor.authorGottfried J.A.
dc.contributor.authorCarpini M.X.D.
dc.contributor.authorJamieson K.H.
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-13T16:59:33Z
dc.date.available2011-10-13T16:59:33Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this article is to investigate the consequences of judicial campaign activity for the perceived legitimacy of the Pennsylvania judiciary. The authors find that politicized campaign ads do detract from court support, although they find practically no difference between traditional campaign ads (e.g., presenting endorsements from groups) and strong attack ads. But this finding must be understood within the context of the 2007 Pennsylvania election increasing court support for all respondents, even those exposed to the most politicized ad content. Being exposed to politicized ads seems to retard the benefits of elections but does not eliminate them. © 2011 University of Utah.
dc.description.versionArticle
dc.identifier.citationPolitical Research Quarterly
dc.identifier.citation64
dc.identifier.citation3
dc.identifier.citationhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-80052246931&partnerID=40&md5=a795011a37916e0587a923213f4d0b8f
dc.identifier.issn10659129
dc.identifier.other10.1177/1065912910370684
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/17154
dc.titleThe effects of judicial campaign activity on the legitimacy of courts: A survey-based experiment
dc.typeArticle
Files
Collections
Stellenbosch University - Scopus Publications