HIV-related discrimination among grade six students in nine Southern African countries

dc.contributor.authorMaughan-Brown, Brendanen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorSpaull, Nicholasen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-15T09:19:56Z
dc.date.available2015-10-15T09:19:56Z
dc.date.issued2014-08en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at http://www.plosone.org/en_ZA
dc.descriptionCITATION: Maughan-Brown, B. & Spaull, N. 2014. HIV-Related Discrimination among Grade Six Students in Nine Southern African Countries. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e102981, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102981.en_ZA
dc.descriptionPublication of this article was funded by the Stellenbosch University Open Access Fund.
dc.description.abstractBackground: HIV-related stigmatisation and discrimination by young children towards their peers have important consequences at the individual level and for our response to the epidemic, yet research on this area is limited. Methods: We used nationally representative data to examine discrimination of HIV-positive children by grade six students (n = 39,664) across nine countries in Southern Africa: Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Descriptive statistics are used to compare discrimination by country, gender, geographic location and socioeconomic status. Multivariate logistic regression is employed to assess potential determinants of discrimination. Results: The levels and determinants of discrimination varied significantly between the nine countries. While one in ten students in Botswana, Malawi, South Africa and Swaziland would ‘‘avoid or shun’’ an HIV positive friend, the proportions in Lesotho, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe were twice as high (approximately 20%). A large proportion of students believed that HIV positive children should not be allowed to continue to attend school, particularly in Zambia (33%), Lesotho (37%) and Zimbabwe (42%). The corresponding figures for Malawi and Swaziland were significantly lower at 13% and 12% respectively. Small differences were found by gender. Children from rural areas and poorer schools were much more likely to discriminate than those from urban areas and wealthier schools. Importantly, we identified factors consistently associated with discrimination across the region: students with greater exposure to HIV information, better general HIV knowledge and fewer misconceptions about transmission of HIV via casual contact were less likely to report discrimination. Conclusions: Our study points toward the need for early interventions (grade six or before) to reduce stigma and discrimination among children, especially in schools situated in rural areas and poorer communities. In particular, interventions should focus on correcting misconceptions that HIV can be transmitted via casual contacten_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.plosone.orgen_ZA
dc.description.versionBackground: HIV-related stigmatisation and discrimination by young children towards their peers have important consequences at the individual level and for our response to the epidemic, yet research on this area is limited. Methods: We used nationally representative data to examine discrimination of HIV-positive children by grade six students (n = 39,664) across nine countries in Southern Africa: Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Descriptive statistics are used to compare discrimination by country, gender, geographic location and socioeconomic status. Multivariate logistic regression is employed to assess potential determinants of discrimination. Results: The levels and determinants of discrimination varied significantly between the nine countries. While one in ten students in Botswana, Malawi, South Africa and Swaziland would ‘‘avoid or shun’’ an HIV positive friend, the proportions in Lesotho, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe were twice as high (approximately 20%). A large proportion of students believed that HIV positive children should not be allowed to continue to attend school, particularly in Zambia (33%), Lesotho (37%) and Zimbabwe (42%). The corresponding figures for Malawi and Swaziland were significantly lower at 13% and 12% respectively. Small differences were found by gender. Children from rural areas and poorer schools were much more likely to discriminate than those from urban areas and wealthier schools. Importantly, we identified factors consistently associated with discrimination across the region: students with greater exposure to HIV information, better general HIV knowledge and fewer misconceptions about transmission of HIV via casual contact were less likely to report discrimination. Conclusions: Our study points toward the need for early interventions (grade six or before) to reduce stigma and discrimination among children, especially in schools situated in rural areas and poorer communities. In particular, interventions should focus on correcting misconceptions that HIV can be transmitted via casual contact.en_ZA
dc.description.versionPublishers' versionen_ZA
dc.format.extent11 pages : illustrations
dc.identifier.citationMaughan-Brown, B. & Spaull, N. 2014. HIV-Related Discrimination among Grade Six Students in Nine Southern African Countries. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e102981, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102981.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203 (online)en_ZA
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102981en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/97567
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_ZA
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyrighten_ZA
dc.subjectHIV-related stigmatisationen_ZA
dc.subjectHIV-related discriminationen_ZA
dc.subjectSouthern African countriesen_ZA
dc.subjectDiscrimination -- Africa Southernen_ZA
dc.subjectStigma (Social psychology) -- Africa, Southernen_ZA
dc.subjectHIV positive children -- Africa, Southernen_ZA
dc.titleHIV-related discrimination among grade six students in nine Southern African countriesen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
maughanbrown_hiv_2014.pdf
Size:
305.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download PDF
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.95 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: