ITEM VIEW

Plagiarism in research : a survey of African medical journals

dc.contributor.authorRohwer, Ankeen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorWager, Elizabethen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Tarynen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorGarner, Paulen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-23T09:33:01Z
dc.date.available2019-10-23T09:33:01Z
dc.date.issued2018-11
dc.identifier.citationRohwer, A., Wager, E., Young, T. & Garner, P. 2018. Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals. BMJ Open 8(11):e024777, doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2018-024777.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055 (online)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024777
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/106703
dc.descriptionCITATION: Rohwer, A., Wager, E., Young, T. & Garner, P. 2018. Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals. BMJ Open 8(11):e024777, doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2018-024777.en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://bmjopen.bmj.com/en_ZA
dc.descriptionThis research article is part of Anke Rohwers' PhD, see http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/103960en_ZA
dc.description.abstractObjectives To examine whether regional biomedical journals in Africa had policies on plagiarism and procedures to detect it; and to measure the extent of plagiarism in their original research articles and reviews. Design Cross sectional survey. Setting and participants We selected journals with an editor-in-chief in Africa, a publisher based in a low or middle income country and with author guidelines in English, and systematically searched the African Journals Online database. From each of the 100 journals identified, we randomly selected five original research articles or reviews published in 2016. Outcomes For included journals, we examined the presence of plagiarism policies and whether they referred to text matching software. We submitted articles to Turnitin and measured the extent of plagiarism (copying of someone else’s work) or redundancy (copying of one’s own work) against a set of criteria we had developed and piloted. Results Of the 100 journals, 26 had a policy on plagiarism and 16 referred to text matching software. Of 495 articles, 313 (63%; 95% CI 58 to 68) had evidence of plagiarism: 17% (83) had at least four linked copied or more than six individual copied sentences; 19% (96) had three to six copied sentences; and the remainder had one or two copied sentences. Plagiarism was more common in the introduction and discussion, and uncommon in the results. Conclusion Plagiarism is common in biomedical research articles and reviews published in Africa. While wholesale plagiarism was uncommon, moderate text plagiarism was extensive. This could rapidly be eliminated if journal editors implemented screening strategies, including text matching software.en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipEffective Health Care Research Consortiumen_ZA
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_ZA
dc.subjectPlagiarismen_ZA
dc.subjectPlagiarism policyen_ZA
dc.subjectBiomedical journals -- Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectArticle reviewsen_ZA
dc.subjectTurnitinen_ZA
dc.titlePlagiarism in research : a survey of African medical journalsen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.description.versionPublishers versionen_ZA
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyrighten_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW