Health systems context(s) for integrating mental health into primary health care in six Emerald countries : a situation analysis

Mugisha, James ; Abdulmalik, Jibril ; Hanlon, Charlotte ; Petersen, Inge ; Lund, Crick ; Upadhaya, Nawaraj ; Ahuja, Shalini ; Shidhaye, Rahul ; Mntambo, Ntokozo ; Alem, Atalay ; Gureje, Oye ; Kigozi, Fred (2017-01-05)

CITATION: Mugisha, J., et al. 2017. Health systems context(s) for integrating mental health into primary health care in six Emerald countries : a situation analysis. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 11:7, doi:10.1186/s13033-016-0114-2.

The original publication is available at https://ijmhs.biomedcentral.com

Article

Background: Mental, neurological and substance use disorders contribute to a significant proportion of the world’s disease burden, including in low and middle income countries (LMICs). In this study, we focused on the health systems required to support integration of mental health into primary health care (PHC) in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda. Methods: A checklist guided by the World Health Organization Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems (WHO-AIMS) was developed and was used for data collection in each of the six countries participating in the Emerging mental health systems in low and middle-income countries (Emerald) research consortium. The documents reviewed were from the following domains: mental health legislation, health policies/plans and relevant country health programs. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results: Three of the study countries (Ethiopia, Nepal, Nigeria, and Uganda) were working towards developing mental health legislation. South Africa and India were ahead of other countries, having enacted recent Mental Health Care Act in 2004 and 2016, respectively. Among all the 6 study countries, only Nepal, Nigeria and South Africa had a standalone mental health policy. However, other countries had related health policies where mental health was mentioned. The lack of fully fledged policies is likely to limit opportunities for resource mobilization for the mental health sector and efforts to integrate mental health into PHC. Most countries were found to be allocating inadequate budgets from the health budget for mental health, with South Africa (5%) and Nepal (0.17%) were the countries with the highest and lowest proportions of health budgets spent on mental health, respectively. Other vital resources that support integration such as human resources and health facilities for mental health services were found to be in adequate in all the study countries. Monitoring and evaluation systems to support the integration of mental health into PHC in all the study countries were also inadequate. Conclusion: Integration of mental health into PHC will require addressing the resource limitations that have been identified in this study. There is a need for up to date mental health legislation and policies to engender commitment in allocating resources to mental health services.

Please refer to this item in SUNScholar by using the following persistent URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/105408
This item appears in the following collections: