Current use and acceptability of novel diagnostic tests for active tuberculosis : a worldwide survey

Amicosante, Massimo ; D’Ambrosio, Lia ; Munoz, Marcela ; Mello, Fernanda Carvalho de Queiroz ; Tebruegge, Marc ; Chegou, Novel N. ; Seghrouchni, Fouad ; Centis, Rosella ; Goletti, Delia ; Bothamley, Graham ; Migliori, Giovanni Battista ; TB Diagnostic Survey Working Group (2017-09-03)

CITATION: Amicosante, M., et al. 2017. Current use and acceptability of novel diagnostic tests for active tuberculosis : a worldwide survey. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 43(5):380-392, doi:10.1590/S1806-37562017000000219.

The original publication is available at http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132017000500380&lng=en&tlng=en

Article

Objective: To determine the current use and potential acceptance (by tuberculosis experts worldwide) of novel rapid tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis that are in line with World Health Organization target product profiles. Methods: A multilingual survey was disseminated online between July and November of 2016. Results: A total of 723 individuals from 114 countries responded to the survey. Smear microscopy was the most commonly used rapid tuberculosis test (available to 90.9% of the respondents), followed by molecular assays (available to 70.7%). Only a small proportion of the respondents in middle- and low-income countries had access to interferon-gamma-release assays. Serological and lateral flow immunoassays were used by more than a quarter (25.4%) of the respondents. Among the respondents who had access to molecular tests, 46.7% were using the Xpert assay overall, that proportion being higher in lower middle-income countries (55.6%) and low-income countries (76.6%). The data also suggest that there was some alignment of pricing for molecular assays. Respondents stated they would accept novel rapid tuberculosis tests if available, including molecular assays (acceptable to 86.0%) or biomarker-based serological assays (acceptable to 81.7%). Simple biomarker-based assays were more commonly deemed acceptable in middle- and lowincome countries. Conclusions: Second-generation molecular assays have become more widely available in high- and low-resource settings. However, the development of novel rapid tuberculosis tests continues to be considered important by tuberculosis experts. Our data also underscore the need for additional training and education of end users.

Please refer to this item in SUNScholar by using the following persistent URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/105367
This item appears in the following collections: