Doctoral Degrees (Institute for Wine Biotechnology)

Permanent URI for this collection

https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/5686

Browse

Browsing Doctoral Degrees (Institute for Wine Biotechnology) by browse.metadata.advisor "Divol, Benoit"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Genetic investigation and characterization of killer toxins secreted by non-Saccharomyces yeasts
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2015-04) Mehlomakulu, Ngwekazi Nwabisa; Divol, Benoit; Setati, Mathabatha Evodia ; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Agrisciences. Dept. of Viticulture and Oenology. Institute for Wine Biotechnology.
    ENGLISH ABSTRACT: In the current study, two isolates showing killer activity against several wine yeast species in a previous study were identified to strain level and found to belong to the yeast species Candida pyralidae. The identified yeast strains and a Kluyveromyces wickerhamii yeast strain used as a control exhibited killer activity against B. bruxellensis known for its spoilage characteristics in red wine, and against several strains of the genus Brettanomyces on white and red grape juice medium. The killer yeasts inhibited neither the growth of S. cerevisiae nor that of the lactic acid bacteria Oenococcus oeni and Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Yeasts are reported to secrete killer toxins, which can play a role in yeast microbial interactions under winemaking conditions. The C. pyralidae strains were found to secrete two novel killer toxins, designated CpKT1 and CpKT2. These killer toxins were stable and active under winemaking conditions, pH 3.5 - 4.5 and temperature ranges between 15 and 25°C. Ethanol and sugar concentrations found during winemaking did not affect the activity and stability of these killer toxins. Although, the killer toxins differed with regards to their biochemical and environmental stability and activity, they were found to have a similar mode of action. The killer toxins induced a fungistatic effect on B. bruxellensis sensitive cells in addition to binding to the cell wall of the sensitive cells, inducing cell surface and plasma membrane damage as did the Kwkt killer toxin secreted by K. wickerhamii. According to the author’s knowledge this is the first report on the identification of novel killer toxins secreted by C. pyralidae strains isolated from a wine environment as well as the identification of the mode of action of killer toxins on B. bruxellensis cells. This indeed provides great research scope in this field. The exoproteomes consisting of the killer toxins Kwkt, CpKT1 and CpKT2 revealed the presence of exo-glucanases and glucosidases, respectively. The enzymes KwExg1 (exoglucanase) and KwSun4 (glucosidase) retrieved from K. wickerhamii’s exoproteome were identified as the potential toxins, but their killer activity could not be confirmed. These findings suggest that hydrolytic enzymes possess killer activity, as previously reported in literature. However, further investigation is needed to identify the killer toxins characterized in this study.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Investigating the impact of MpAPr1, an aspartic protease from the yeast Metschnikowia pulcherrima, on wine properties
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2017-03) Theron, Louwrens Wiid; Divol, Benoit; Bely, Marina; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of AgriSciences. Dept. of Viticulture and Oenology. Institute for Wine Biotechnology.
    ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Protein removal is a key step during the production of white wine in order to avoid the possible appearance of a harmless but unsightly haze. Alternatives to the use of bentonite are actively sought because of technological, organoleptic and sustainable issues associated with its use. Acid proteases that are able to break down proteins under winemaking conditions could be one such alternative. Recent literature reports the successful outcome of the addition of fungal aspartic proteases from Aspergillus and Botrytis. In this study, MpAPr1, an extracellular aspartic protease previously isolated and partially characterised from the yeast Metschnikowia pulcherrima, was cloned and expressed heterologously in Komagataella pastoris. Enzymatic properties of MpAPr1 were initially (Km, Vmax, K’i, optimal pH and temperature for protease activity, impact of minerals, sugars and ethanol on protease activity) characterised in a crude extract. After several attempts using different techniques, MpAPr1 was successfully purified via cation exchange chromatography. Its activity against haze-forming grape proteins was initially tested in a model solution under optimal environmental conditions (for MpAPr1 activity) and under those occurring during winemaking (pH 3.5 and 25°C). Thereafter, MpAPr1 activity was evaluated in grape must and throughout alcoholic fermentation. These experiments showed that MpAPr1 was able to degrade certain haze-forming proteins, especially chitinases, under optimal conditions and to a lesser extent under winemaking conditions. Prior denaturation of the target proteins by heat treatment was also not required. Moreover, MpAPr1 was able to degrade yeast proteins in a model solution under both conditions. Finally, the presence of MpAPr1, supplemented to grape must, resulted in the partial degradation of grape proteins throughout fermentation and ultimately in a slight difference in the wine’s volatile compound composition. Winemaking conditions limited its impact and it is thus proposed that future work focus on enhancing MpAPr1 activity to make it a viable alternative to bentonite. The study nevertheless provides further evidence that aspartic proteases could represent a potential alternative to bentonite for the wine industry and that non-Saccharomyces yeasts such as M. pulcherrima could have a beneficial impact on wine properties.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Metabolomic profiling of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2016-03) Whitener, Margaret Elizabeth Beckner; Du Toit, Maret; Divol, Benoit; Vrhovsek, Urska; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Agrisciences. Dept. of Viticulture and Oenology. Institute for Wine Biotechnology.
    ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Recent trends in wine making have led to the commercial production and use of non- Saccharomyces yeasts in wine making. Very little is understood however about how the use of these yeasts affects the final product. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the chemical and sensory characteristics of wine fermented with non-Saccharomyces yeasts using a sequential inoculation strategy. Targeted and untargeted analysis techniques were developed to help identify and quantify the volatile fraction of the wines produced. By combining this and sensory data we were able to build the most comprehensive picture to date of the volatile wine metabolome as it is influenced by various yeast species. The first step was a literature review dedicated to summarizing the current knowledge surrounding the metabolomics of the yeasts used in the subsequent chapters. Specifically, we sought to understand what is currently known about the use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine. Also investigated were the technologies currently being used in the fields of food, wine, and yeast metabolomics. The goal was to provide the background necessary to understand the research in the subsequent chapters, as well as aid in the development and planning of the experiments discussed here within. Two stages of research were conducted. Not only did we want to understand the effects of non-Saccharomyces yeasts on wine aroma but we were interested in whether or not these effects were the same in both red and white wines. As such the first research stage, was a preliminary investigation of the yeast response to two different grape musts. Five different species of non- Saccharomyces yeasts, were chosen and grown in both Shiraz and Sauvignon blanc must and samples were collected for analysis just prior to the point at which Saccharomyces cerevisiae would usually be added to complete the fermentation. The fermentation rates were monitored and the chemical profile of the musts was evaluated. A solid-phase microextraction-Gas Chromatography-Mass spectrometry method that targeted 90 different compounds known to be found in wine was used to evaluate the headspace of the fermented musts. The results obtained helped shape the experimental design for the next phase of the project. The scale was increased to full wine production to evaluate how the yeasts could influence a completed wine product. Again, Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz were chosen and an untargeted chemical analysis method was developed to ensure that the widest possible range of analytes could be evaluated. The finished Sauvignon blanc wine was also subjected to sensory analysis which provided even greater insight into how these inoculation strategies can change the sensory profile of the wine. This research was undertaken in an attempt to answer the questions of ‘What will the wine smell and taste like if I use non-Saccharomyces yeasts during fermentation?’ and ‘Could it be superior to standard wines only inoculated with S. cerevisiae?’ The experiments conducted provided a great deal of insight that can help to begin answering these questions but there is much that remains unknown. In general, we were able to build a detailed volatiles chemical profile for each of the yeast treatments used in both Shiraz and Sauvignon blanc. While some treatments proved to be somewhat detrimental to the aroma and flavor of the wine, others showed promise in possibly enhancing its complexity. We were also able to demonstrate that the yeasts behave very differently in the two different musts. As comprehensive as these studies were, future work should be undertaken to improve the understanding of why and how these yeasts can make an impact on wine production. For example, our work did not include any genetic expression analysis of the yeasts used. Correlating genetic expression to quantitative chemical analysis would provide a much more complete picture of the wine yeast metabolome.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Metagenomic screening of cell wall hydrolases, their anti-fungal activities and potential role in wine fermentation
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2015-04) Ghosh, Soumya; Setati, Mathabatha Evodia; Divol, Benoit; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Agrisciences. Dept. of Viticulture and Oenology. Institute for Wine Biotechnology.
    ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The grape and wine ecosystem contains fungi, bacteria and yeasts whose interactions contribute to the final wine product. While the non-Saccharomyces yeasts are dominant in the early stage of alcoholic fermentation, the later stage is always dominated by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Although their presence in wine fermentation is often short-lived, the non-Saccharomyces yeasts are known to produce an array of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes which facilitate the extraction and release of aroma compounds, but might also play a role in microbial interactions. The present study aimed to investigate the microbial diversity of grape juice and to evaluate the potential of non-Saccharomyces yeasts to produce hydrolytic enzymes and display anti-fungal properties. To capture the microbial diversity, culture-dependent (plating) and –independent (Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis (ARISA)) techniques were used in parallel. The fungal and bacterial ARISA displayed a wider range of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in comparison to cultivation-based technique, demonstrating that ARISA is a powerful culture-independent technique applicable to ecological studies in wine. Some of the uncommon yeast isolates derived from our cultivation-based study were subjected to an enzymatic screening process. Hydrolases, such as chitinases, β-1,4-cellulases, β-1,3-1,6-glucanases, β-glucosidases, pectinases and acid proteases were specifically sought. Most of the yeast isolates exhibited chitinase, β-1,4-cellulase as well as β-1,3-1,6-glucanase activities. Only Metschnikowia chrysoperlae exhibited β-glucosidase activity. We also retrieved the partial chitinase gene sequences from M. chrysoperlae, Pichia burtonii, Hyphopichia pseudoburtonii that exhibited chitinase activity. Among the isolates, Pseudozyma fusiformata exhibited a strong antagonistic activity against the wine spoilage yeasts B. bruxellensis AWRI 1499 and B. anomalus IWBT Y105. Furthermore, we showed that the killer phenotype of P. fusiformata cannot be attributed to a viral encoded dsRNA. Finally, two metagenomic approaches were employed in an attempt to explore the indigenous microbiome in a more holistic manner, where we adopted whole metagenome Roche GS-FLX 454-pyrosequencing and construction of a fosmid library. The whole metagenome sequencing revealed a wide range of hydrolytic enzymes that showed homology to enzymes from different fungal and non-Saccharomyces yeast species. Moreover, the metagenomic library screening resulted in the retrieval of 22 chitinase and 11 β-glucosidase positive fosmid clones originating from yeasts. Two clones of interest, BgluFos-G10 and ChiFos-C21, were subjected to next generation sequencing. BgluFos-G10 revealed 2 ORFs exhibiting homology to glycosyl hydrolase family 16 proteins whereas no ORFs encoding chitinase enzymes could be identified in the ChiFos-C21 clone. However, all the potential ORFs identified exhibited homology to a gene cluster from Clavispora lusitaniae ATCC 42720, suggesting that the cloned DNA fragments belonged to a yeast species closely related to C. lusitaniae or members of the family Metschnikowiaceae. Overall, our study identified a variety of novel hydrolytic enzymes. However, retrieving the full gene sequences of these identified enzymes would be the immediate follow-up of our study. Moreover, the hydrolytic and antifungal activities exhibited by the yeast isolate could be of major interest in evaluating their potential as biocontrol agents against grapevine fungal pathogens and subsequently the wine spoilage yeasts. It would be interesting to evaluate as well the potential impact of these enzymes under wine making condition and could be our next step of investigation.