Turnaround times – the Achilles’ heel of community screening and testing in Cape Town, South Africa: A short report

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPorter, James Den_ZA
dc.contributor.authorMash, Roberten_ZA
dc.contributor.authorPreiser, Wolfgangen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-24T12:32:24Z
dc.date.available2022-03-24T12:32:24Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.descriptionPorter JD, Mash R, Preiser W. Turnaround times – the Achilles’ heel of community screening and testing in Cape Town, South Africa: A short report. Afr J Prm Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1), a2624. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2624
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at http://www.phcfm.org
dc.descriptionAfrican Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine
dc.description.abstractEarly in the course of the coronavirus infection disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in South Africa, the Department of Health implemented a policy of community screening and testing (CST). This was based on a community-orientated primary care approach and was a key strategy in limiting the spread of the pandemic, but it struggled with long turnaround times (TATs) for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test. The local experience at Symphony Way Community Day Centre (Delft, Cape Town), highlighted these challenges. The first positive tests had a median TAT of 4.5 days, peaking at 29 days in mid-May 2020. Issues that contributed to long TATs were unavailability of viral transport medium, sample delivery and storage difficulties, staffing problems, scarcity of testing supplies and other samples prioritised over CST samples. At Symphony Way, many patients who tested COVID-19 positive had abandoned their self-isolation because of the delay in results. Employers were unhappy with prolonged sick leave whilst waiting for results and patients were concerned about not getting paid or job loss. The CST policy relies on a rapid TAT to be successful. Once the TAT is delayed, the process of contacting patients, and tracing and quarantining contacts becomes ineffective. With hindsight, other countries’ difficulties in upscaling testing should have served as warning. Community screening and testing was scaled back from 18 May 2020, and testing policy was changed to only include high-risk patients from 29 May 2020. The delayed TATs meant that the CST policy had no beneficial impact at local level.en_ZA
dc.format.extent3 pages
dc.identifier.citationPorter JD, Mash R, Preiser W. Turnaround times – the Achilles’ heel of community screening and testing in Cape Town, South Africa: A short report. Afr J Prm Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1), a2624. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2624
dc.identifier.issn(Online) 2071-2936
dc.identifier.issn(Print) 2071-2928
dc.identifier.otherdoi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2624
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/124361
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherAOSIS
dc.publisherAuthors retain copyright
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_ZA
dc.subjectturnaround timesen_ZA
dc.subjectcommunity screening and testingen_ZA
dc.subjectCape Townen_ZA
dc.titleTurnaround times – the Achilles’ heel of community screening and testing in Cape Town, South Africa: A short reporten_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Porter_Mash_Preiser_Turnaround times-the Achilles heel of community screening_2020.pdf
Size:
510.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Research Articles (Medical Virology)