Fact-Checking Role Performances and Problematic Covid-19 Vaccine Content in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorRiedlinger, Michelleen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorMontana‐Nino, Silviaen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorWatt, Neden_ZA
dc.contributor.authorGarcia‐Perdomo, Victoren_ZA
dc.contributor.authorJoubert, Marinaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-14T10:10:54Z
dc.date.available2024-10-14T10:10:54Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-14en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at: https://www.cogitatiopress.comen_ZA
dc.description.abstractThe move from political fact-checking to a “public health” or debunking model of fact-checking, sustained by policies and funding from platforms, highlights important tensions in the case of Covid-19. Building on findings from studies focused on journalistic role performance, we investigated how professional fact-checkers in Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa conceived of and performed their professional roles when addressing Covid-19 vaccination topics. Interviews with fact-checkers from six well-established, Meta-affiliated, International Fact-Checking Network-accredited organizations operating in these regions indicated that fact-checkers recognized the diversification of tasks and new roles associated with addressing problematic content from social media users. However, fact-checkers expressed unanimous commitment to prioritizing political and media watchdog activities in response to problematic Covid-19 vaccine information spreading from elite sources. To compare these role conceptions with role performance, we conducted a content analysis of Covid-19 vaccine content posted in 2021 to these fact-checkers’ Facebook accounts. We found that content was mostly associated with explainers or debunking content (addressing hoaxes or rumors about Covid-19 vaccines from non-elite social media users). In particular, the abundance of explainers, compared with other genres of fact-checking content, aligns fact-checkers with professional roles as civic service providers, educators, and “interpreters” of health information. Only a small proportion of the Covid-19 vaccine-related posts from each fact-checker contained verifications of claims from authoritative (elite “top-down”) sources (i.e., politicians, media, and health/science professionals). This study offers insights into a particularly tumultuous time of political activity in these regions and considers implications for practice innovation.en_ZA
dc.description.urittps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/8680en_ZA
dc.description.versionPublisher’s versionen_ZA
dc.format.extent25 pagesen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationRiedlinger, M., et al. 2024. Fact-Checking Role Performances and Problematic Covid-19 Vaccine Content in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. Media and Communication, 12(2024):25 pages. doi.10.17645/mac.8680en_ZA
dc.identifier.doi10.17645/mac.8680en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn2183-2439 (online)en_ZA
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4402-4824en_ZA
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4238-0801en_ZA
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0008-6649-9920en_ZA
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7187-1618en_ZA
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0178-1796en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/131283
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCogitatio Pressen_ZA
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyrighten_ZA
dc.titleFact-Checking Role Performances and Problematic Covid-19 Vaccine Content in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africaen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
riedlinger_fact_2024.pdf
Size:
1.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.02 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Collection L