Towards a framework to guide the evaluation of inclusive innovation systems

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBotha, Louisaen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorGrobbelaar, Saraen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorBam, Wouteren_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-12T06:44:55Z
dc.date.available2016-12-12T06:44:55Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.descriptionCITATION: Botha, L., Grobbelaar, S. & Bam, W. 2016. Towards a framework to guide the evaluation of inclusive innovation systems. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 27(3):64-78, doi:10.7166/27-3-1632.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at http://sajie.journals.ac.za
dc.description.abstractENGLISH ABSTRACT: Innovation for inclusive development aims not only to produce products and services for ‘base of the pyramid’ (BoP) markets, but also to improve innovative capacity and empower those that form part of the BoP. Although a wide range of actors aim to support innovation for inclusive development, they lack proper methods to assess the impact that these projects have. This paper sets out to identify an appropriate method or approach for evaluating systems change brought about by innovation for inclusive development projects. Based on a systematic literature review, a process-level approach is proposed. This approach is focused on the components within a system and the changes that occur in the system functions.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractAFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Inklusiewe innovasie beoog nie net om produkte en dienste aan die basis van die piramide mark te verskaf nie, maar ook om hul te bemagtig en kapasiteit vir innovasie te verhoog. Innovasie rolspelers streef daarna om inklusiewe innovasie te bevorder, maar daar is ’n tekort aan voldoende metodes wat gebruik kan word om die impak van inklusiewe innovasie projekte te evalueer. Die doel van die studie is om ’n toepaslike metode vir die evaluasie van stelsel veranderinge, wat deur inklusiewe innovasie projekte meegebring is, te identifiseer. ’n Proses-vlak metode, wat fokus op die komponente in ’n stelsel en die veranderinge wat plaasvind in die stelsel se funksies, was voorgestel op grond van ’n sistematiese literatuurstudie.af_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://sajie.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/1632
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.format.extent15 pagesen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationBotha, L., Grobbelaar, S. & Bam, W. 2016. Towards a framework to guide the evaluation of inclusive innovation systems. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 27(3):64-78, doi:10.7166/27-3-1632
dc.identifier.issn2224-7890 (online)
dc.identifier.issn1012-277X (print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.7166/27-3-1632
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/99975
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherSouthern African Institute for Industrial Engineeringen_ZA
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyrighten_ZA
dc.subjectParticipatory monitoring and evaluation (Project management)en_ZA
dc.subjectInnovations, Industrial -- Systemsen_ZA
dc.subjectTechnological innovationsen_ZA
dc.titleTowards a framework to guide the evaluation of inclusive innovation systemsen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
botha_towards_2016.pdf
Size:
760.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.95 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Research Articles (Industrial Engineering)