The effect of two different visual presentation modalities on the narratives of mainstream grade 3 children
dc.contributor.author | Klop, Daleen | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Engelbrecht, Lizanne | en_ZA |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-09T10:12:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-09T10:12:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-11 | |
dc.description | CITATION: Klop, D. & Engelbrecht, L. 2013. The effect of two different visual presentation modalities on the narratives of mainstream grade 3 children. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 60(1):21-26. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v60i1.6. | en_ZA |
dc.description | The original publication is available at http://www.sajcd.org.za/index.php/sajcd/article/view/6 | en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: This study investigated whether a dynamic visual presentation method (a soundless animated video presentation) would elicit better narratives than a static visual presentation method (a wordless picture book). Method: Twenty mainstream grade 3 children were randomly assigned to two groups and assessed with one of the visual presentation methods. Narrative performance was measured in terms of micro- and macrostructure variables. Microstructure variables included productivity (total number of words, total number of T-units), syntactic complexity (mean length of T-unit) and lexical diversity measures (number of different words). Macrostructure variables included episodic structure in terms of goal-attempt-outcome (GAO) sequences. Results: Both visual presentation modalities elicited narratives of similar quantity and quality in terms of the micro- and macrostructure variables that were investigated. Conclusion: Animation of picture stimuli did not elicit better narratives than static picture stimuli. | en_ZA |
dc.description.version | Publishers Version | en_ZA |
dc.format.extent | pages 21-26 : illustations | |
dc.identifier.citation | Klop, D. & Engelbrecht, L. 2013. The effect of two different visual presentation modalities on the narratives of mainstream grade 3 children. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 60(1):21-26. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v60i1.6. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 2225-4765 (online) | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 0379-8046 (print) | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.other | doi:10.4102/sajcd.v60i1.6 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/96477 | |
dc.language.iso | en_ZA | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | AOSIS Publishing | en_ZA |
dc.rights.holder | Authors retain copyright | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Speech therapy for children -- Technological innovations | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Computer-assisted instruction | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Language disorders in children -- Therapy -- Technological innovations | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Communicative disorders in children -- Therapy -- Technological innovations | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Storytelling ability in children | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Pictures in education | en_ZA |
dc.title | The effect of two different visual presentation modalities on the narratives of mainstream grade 3 children | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |