On politics of friendship
| dc.contributor.author | Smit, D. J. | en_ZA |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-13T11:44:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-01-13T11:44:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-07-16 | |
| dc.description | CITATON: Smit, D. J. 2021. Stellenbosch Theological Journal 2021, 7(1):1–39, doi:10.17570/stj.2021.v7n1.a13. | en_ZA |
| dc.description | The original publication is available at https://ojs.reformedjournals.co.za | |
| dc.description.abstract | The paper distinguishes four dominant discourses in contemporary so-called politics of friendship, namely a politics of enmity (Schmitt), a politics based on the notion of friends as “another self” (Aristotle), a politics of love (Augustine), and a politics of “perhaps” (Derrida). It then considers if and how Koopman’s person and work fit into such a typology. | en_ZA |
| dc.description.version | Publisher's version | |
| dc.format.extent | 39 pages | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Smit, D. J. 2021. Stellenbosch Theological Journal 2021, 7(1):1–39, doi:10.17570/stj.2021.v7n1.a13. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2226-2385 (online) | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0028-2006 (print) | |
| dc.identifier.other | doi:10.17570/stj.2021.v7n1.a13 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/125869 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher | Pieter de Waal Neethling Trust | |
| dc.rights.holder | Author retains copyright | |
| dc.subject | Friendship | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Friendship -- Political aspects | en_ZA |
| dc.title | On politics of friendship | en_ZA |
| dc.type | Article | en_ZA |