Citation classics in systematic reviews and meta-analyses : who wrote the top 100 most cited articles?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorUthman, Olalekan A.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorOkwundu, Charles I.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Tarynen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorWiysonge, Charles S.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Aileenen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-07T12:26:05Z
dc.date.available2014-07-07T12:26:05Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.descriptionCITATION: Uthman, O. A. et al. 2013. Citation classics in systematic reviews and meta-analyses : who wrote the top 100 most cited articles? PLoS ONE, 8(10): e78517, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078517.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at http://journals.plos.org/plosone
dc.description.abstractBackground Systematic reviews of the literature occupy the highest position in currently proposed hierarchies of evidence. The aims of this study were to assess whether citation classics exist in published systematic review and meta-analysis (SRM), examine the characteristics of the most frequently cited SRM articles, and evaluate the contribution of different world regions. Methods The 100 most cited SRM were identified in October 2012 using the Science Citation Index database of the Institute for Scientific Information. Data were extracted by one author. Spearman’s correlation was used to assess the association between years since publication, numbers of authors, article length, journal impact factor, and average citations per year. Results Among the 100 citation classics, published between 1977 and 2008, the most cited article received 7308 citations and the least-cited 675 citations. The average citations per year ranged from 27.8 to 401.6. First authors from the USA produced the highest number of citation classics (n=46), followed by the UK (n=28) and Canada (n=15). The 100 articles were published in 42 journals led by the Journal of the American Medical Association (n=18), followed by the British Medical Journal (n=14) and The Lancet (n=13). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between number of authors (Spearman’s rho=0.320, p=0.001), journal impact factor (rho=0.240, p=0.016) and average citations per year. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between average citations per year and year since publication (rho = -0.636, p=0.0001). The most cited papers identified seminal contributions and originators of landmark methodological aspects of SRM and reflect major advances in the management of and predisposing factors for chronic diseases. Conclusions Since the late 1970s, the USA, UK, and Canada have taken leadership in the production of citation classic papers. No first author from low or middle-income countries (LMIC) led one of the most cited 100 SRM.
dc.description.urihttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078517
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.format.extent11 pages
dc.identifier.citationUthman, O. A. et al. 2013. Citation classics in systematic reviews and meta-analyses : who wrote the top 100 most cited articles? PLoS ONE, 8(10): e78517, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078517.
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203 (online)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078517
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/93455
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyright
dc.subjectBibliographical citationsen_ZA
dc.subjectSystematic reviews (Medical research)en_ZA
dc.titleCitation classics in systematic reviews and meta-analyses : who wrote the top 100 most cited articles?en_ZA
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
uthman_citation_2013.PDF
Size:
1014.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
Download
Collections
Research Articles (Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care)