A cost-effectiveness analysis of a home-based HIV counselling and testing intervention versus the standard (facility based) HIV testing strategy in rural South Africa
dc.contributor.author | Tabana, Hanani | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Nkonki, Lungiswa | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Hongoro, Charles | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Doherty, Tanya | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Ekström, Anna Mia | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Naik, Reshma | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Zembe-Mkabile, Wanga | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Jackson, Debra | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Thorson, Anna | en_ZA |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-08T10:42:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-07-08T10:42:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.description | CITATION: Tabana, H., et al. 2015. A cost-effectiveness analysis of a home- based HIV counselling and testing intervention versus the standard (facility based) HIV testing strategy in rural South Africa. PLoS ONE, 10(8): 1-13, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135048. | en_ZA |
dc.description | The original publication is available at http://journals.plos.org/plosone | en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: There is growing evidence concerning the acceptability and feasibility of home-based HIV testing. However, less is known about the cost-effectiveness of the approach yet it is a critical component to guide decisions about scaling up access to HIV testing. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of a home-based HIV testing intervention in rural South Africa. Methods: Two alternatives: clinic and home-based HIV counselling and testing were compared. Costs were analysed from a provider’s perspective for the period of January to December 2010. The outcome, HIV counselling and testing (HCT) uptake was obtained from the Good Start home-based HIV counselling and testing (HBHCT) cluster randomised control trial undertaken in KwaZulu-Natal province. Cost-effectiveness was estimated for a target population of 22,099 versus 23,864 people for intervention and control communities respectively. Average costs were calculated as the cost per client tested, while cost-effectiveness was calculated as the cost per additional client tested through HBHCT. Results: Based on effectiveness of 37% in the intervention (HBHCT) arm compared to 16% in control arm, home based testing costs US$29 compared to US$38 per person for clinic HCT. The incremental cost effectiveness per client tested using HBHCT was $19. Conclusions: HBHCT was less costly and more effective. Home-based HCT could present a cost-effective alternative for rural ‘hard to reach’ populations depending on affordability by the health system, and should be considered as part of community outreach programs. | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0135048 | |
dc.description.version | Publisher's version | |
dc.format.extent | 13 pages | |
dc.identifier.citation | Tabana, H., et al. 2015. A cost-effectiveness analysis of a home- based HIV counselling and testing intervention versus the standard (facility based) HIV testing strategy in rural South Africa. PLoS ONE, 10(8): 1-13, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135048 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 (online) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 (print) | |
dc.identifier.other | doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135048 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/99118 | |
dc.language.iso | en_ZA | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | Public Library of Science | en_ZA |
dc.rights.holder | Authors retain copyright | en_ZA |
dc.subject | HIV infections -- Diagnosis -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal -- Cost effectiveness | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Health counseling -- South Africaa -- KwaZulu-Natal -- Cost effectiveness | en_ZA |
dc.title | A cost-effectiveness analysis of a home-based HIV counselling and testing intervention versus the standard (facility based) HIV testing strategy in rural South Africa | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |