The availability of alternative devices for the management of the difficult airway in public emergency centres in the Western Cape

dc.contributor.advisorVan Hoving, Daniel Jacobusen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorJooste, Willem Johannes Lodewyken_ZA
dc.contributor.otherStellenbosch University. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Dept. of Family and Emergency Medicine.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-07T09:13:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-11T10:24:04Z
dc.date.available2017-09-07T09:13:43Z
dc.date.available2017-12-11T10:24:04Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.descriptionThe published article is available in this repository at http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/125681en_ZA
dc.descriptionThesis (MMed)--Stellenbosch University, 2017.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractENGLISH SUMMARY: Background: The failed or difficult airway is a rare, but life-threatening situation. Alternative airway devices to direct laryngoscopy are essential aids to manage these scenarios successfully. Objective: To determine which alternative airway devices are currently available in public emergency centres in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted in 15 emergency centres. Data regarding the availability of different classes of alternative airway devices was documented on a standardised data collection sheet by a single investigator via direct observation. Incomplete or non-functional equipment was classified as ‘unavailable’. Summary statistics were used to describe the data. Results: Twenty-six different types of alternative airway devices were documented. Three centres (20%) had no alternative airway device. Five centres (33.3%) stocked only one device, three centres (20%) had two devices and four centres (26.7%) had more than two devices. Most centres (n=12, 80%) stocked supraglottic airways (only one centre (6.7%) had paediatric sizes). Tracheal tube introducers were available in five centres (33.3%). Four centres (26.7%) had video-laryngoscopes, but none had optical laryngoscopes. Retroglottic devices and needle cricothyroidotomy equipment were available in two centres (13.3%). Although surgical cricothyroidotomy equipment was available, the equipment was widely dispersed and only three centres (20%) had pre-packed sets available. None of the specialised paediatric centres had needle cricothyroidotomy equipment readily available. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that Western Cape public emergency centres are currently inadequately stocked with regards to alternative airway devices. A guideline regarding the procurement and implementation of these devices is needed.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractAFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Geen opsomming beskikbaar.af_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X14001372
dc.description.versionMasters
dc.format.extent60 pages : includes annexures
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/102550
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherStellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
dc.rights.holderStellenbosch University
dc.subjectRespiratory organs -- Obstructions -- Western Cape (South Africa)en_ZA
dc.subjectRespiratory emergencies -- Western Cape (South Africa)en_ZA
dc.subjectAirway (Medicine) -- Western Cape (South Africa)en_ZA
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.titleThe availability of alternative devices for the management of the difficult airway in public emergency centres in the Western Capeen_ZA
dc.typeThesisen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jooste_availability_2017.pdf
Size:
1.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: