Rejoinder to article by Harold M Shroder : the fallacy of using in-basket based measures for the validation of leadership dimensions
Date
2004-10
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
AOSIS
Abstract
A response is given to the critical questions and concerns raised by Schroder (2004) on the validation study by
Spangenberg and Theron (2003). The importance of open debate as an expression of scientific rationally in service
of the epistemic ideal of science is acknowledged. Schroder’s (2004) concern essentially centers on the use of the inbasket
as a stand-alone measure and the appropriateness of the design of the Spangenberg and Theron (2003) study
for the investigation of the validity of the HPLC’s. The objectives of the Spangenberg and Theron (2003) study are
re-examined. The prudence of using and validating the in-basket as a stand-alone measure is discussed.
Repliek word gelewer op die kritise vrae en besorgdhede wat deur Schroder (2004) geopper word oor die validasiestudie van Spangenberg en Theron (2003). Die belang van ’n oop gesprek as manifestasie van die rasionaliteit van wetenskap in diens van die epistemiese ideal word erken. Schroder (2004) se kommer sentreer wesenlik rondom die gebruik van die posmandjie as ‘n meetinstrument in eie reg en die toepaslikheid van die ontwerp van die Spangenberg en Theron (2003) studie vir die validasie van die HPLC’s. Die doelstellings van die Spangenberg en Theron (2003) studie word weer in oënskou geneem. Die wysheid om die posmandjie as ’n meetinstrument in eie reg te gebruik en te valideer word bespreek.
Repliek word gelewer op die kritise vrae en besorgdhede wat deur Schroder (2004) geopper word oor die validasiestudie van Spangenberg en Theron (2003). Die belang van ’n oop gesprek as manifestasie van die rasionaliteit van wetenskap in diens van die epistemiese ideal word erken. Schroder (2004) se kommer sentreer wesenlik rondom die gebruik van die posmandjie as ‘n meetinstrument in eie reg en die toepaslikheid van die ontwerp van die Spangenberg en Theron (2003) studie vir die validasie van die HPLC’s. Die doelstellings van die Spangenberg en Theron (2003) studie word weer in oënskou geneem. Die wysheid om die posmandjie as ’n meetinstrument in eie reg te gebruik en te valideer word bespreek.
Description
The original publication can be found at http://www.sajip.co.za
CITATION: Spangenberg, H. H. & Theron, C. C. 2004. Rejoinder to article by Harold M Shroder : the fallacy of using in-basket based measures for the validation of leadership dimensions. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(2):a149, doi:10.4102/sajip.v30i2.149.
CITATION: Spangenberg, H. H. & Theron, C. C. 2004. Rejoinder to article by Harold M Shroder : the fallacy of using in-basket based measures for the validation of leadership dimensions. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(2):a149, doi:10.4102/sajip.v30i2.149.
Keywords
Leadership
Citation
Spangenberg, H. H. & Theron, C. C. 2004. Rejoinder to article by Harold M Shroder: The fallacy of using in-basket based measures for the validation of leadership dimensions. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(2), 107-108, doi:10.4102/sajip.v30i2.149.