Who Cares? Work in South African Farmworker Homes: A Dialectical Materialist Methodology
Date
2024-12
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
Abstract
This dissertation investigates the social issue surrounding farmworkers who transition out of temporary employment for work in homes. It employs Social Reproduction Theory (SRT) as both eminent social theory of work in homes (Hopkins, 2017) and as dialectical materialist methodology (Davis, 1981; Federici, 1998; Bhattacharya, 2017a,b; McNally, 2017). The findings suggest that despite SRT’s neglect to research workers in homes as inclusive of children, given the advancements in Childhood Studies and Social Reproduction Feminism (SRF) SRT has begun theorising child work in homes.
The philosophical analyses examine the underpinnings of SRT’s dialectical materialist methodology. The ontological analysis argues dialectical materialism excels at rendering the best understandings of social phenomena. This is because dialectical materialism is not only a social theory, but also a method of enquiry. The epistemological analysis finds dialectical materialism further distinguished as social scientific methodology for its comparative method, empirical grounding, and scientific evidence-based pursuit of knowledge.
The theoretical and conceptual analyses reveal SRT’s methodological limitations. SRT has significantly broadened its narrowly concrete theorisation of work in homes of white Anglo-American middle-class adult women. Yet, SRT's 'strategic essentialism' (Hochschild, 2003) conceptualises concretes of work, has yet to reach conceptual consensus, and a rigorous conceptualisation of work, in homes. This dissertation theorises work abstractly. This heeds Marx methodology and suggestion that work in the social economy “be treated and analysed according to the existing empirical data” (1932: 49) to derive concrete social theories.
The research design was informed by the comparative method SRT’s dialectical materialism methodology. Qualitative data was collected at three points in time over one year from quotas of 12 farmworking women stratified by residence (farm/town) and employment (permanent/temporary). Validation of the findings necessitated an abductive analysis to triangulate the empirical findings with parallel data from Childhood Studies, SRF, and Social Reproduction in Education (SRE), in addition to SRT.
The historical analyses reveal a social reorganisation of work, workers, and workplaces, emphasising the importance of contextualising social research. Nineteenth century ‘child workers’ have been reconceived adult ‘workers’; and, ‘child scholars’ and whom without adult supervisionary ‘care’ are ‘neglected’ children. The contemporary analysis finds despite prohibition of child employment, even in agriculture, the hours of child work in schools have yet to be renegotiated in over 200 years, especially for the youngest most vulnerable scholars.
This dissertation emphasises the value of dialectical materialism as social scientific methodology. It raises concern for the Social State of Neglect of vulnerable children, especially during employment hours. It proposes urgent national and international social policy reforms to address the social disjunctures in the social organisation of work, achieve the ‘Social’ objectives of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and ensure the fundamental and paramount Rights of children to ‘care’ and protection from ‘neglect’.
Description
Thesis (DPhil)--Stellenbosch University, 2024.