Virologic failure and second-line antiretroviral therapy in children in South Africa-the IeDEA Southern Africa collaboration
dc.contributor.author | Davies M.-A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Moultrie H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Eley B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rabie H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Van Cutsem G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Giddy J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wood R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Technau K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Keiser O. | |
dc.contributor.author | Egger M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Boulle A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-15T16:16:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-05-15T16:16:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: With expanding pediatric antiretroviral therapy (ART) access, children will begin to experience treatment failure and require second-line therapy. We evaluated the probability and determinants of virologic failure and switching in children in South Africa. Methods: Pooled analysis of routine individual data from children who initiated ART in 7 South African treatment programs with 6-monthly viral load and CD4 monitoring produced Kaplan-Meier estimates of probability of virologic failure (2 consecutive unsuppressed viral loads with the second being >1000 copies/mL, after 24 weeks of therapy) and switch to second-line. Cox-proportional hazards models stratified by program were used to determine predictors of these outcomes. Results: The 3-year probability of virologic failure among 5485 children was 19.3% (95% confidence interval: 17.6 to 21.1). Use of nevirapine or ritonavir alone in the initial regimen (compared with efavirenz) and exposure to prevention of mother to child transmission regimens were independently associated with failure [adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval): 1.77 (1.11 to 2.83), 2.39 (1.57 to 3.64) and 1.40 (1.02 to 1.92), respectively]. Among 252 children with 1 year follow-up after failure, 38% were switched to second-line. Median (interquartile range) months between failure and switch was 5.7 (2.9-11.0). Conclusions: Triple ART based on nevirapine or ritonavir as a single protease inhibitor seems to be associated with a higher risk of virologic failure. A low proportion of virologically failing children were switched. Copyright © 2011 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. | |
dc.description.version | Article | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes | |
dc.identifier.citation | 56 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 3 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 15254135 | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182060610 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/13945 | |
dc.subject | efavirenz | |
dc.subject | lamivudine | |
dc.subject | lopinavir | |
dc.subject | nevirapine | |
dc.subject | ritonavir | |
dc.subject | stavudine | |
dc.subject | zidovudine | |
dc.subject | article | |
dc.subject | CD4 lymphocyte count | |
dc.subject | child | |
dc.subject | female | |
dc.subject | follow up | |
dc.subject | highly active antiretroviral therapy | |
dc.subject | human | |
dc.subject | Human immunodeficiency virus infection | |
dc.subject | major clinical study | |
dc.subject | male | |
dc.subject | preschool child | |
dc.subject | priority journal | |
dc.subject | probability | |
dc.subject | South Africa | |
dc.subject | treatment duration | |
dc.subject | treatment failure | |
dc.subject | vertical transmission | |
dc.subject | virology | |
dc.subject | virus load | |
dc.subject | Anti-HIV Agents | |
dc.subject | Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active | |
dc.subject | CD4 Lymphocyte Count | |
dc.subject | Child | |
dc.subject | Child, Preschool | |
dc.subject | Drug Monitoring | |
dc.subject | Female | |
dc.subject | HIV Infections | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Infant | |
dc.subject | Male | |
dc.subject | Nevirapine | |
dc.subject | Pregnancy | |
dc.subject | Ritonavir | |
dc.subject | Salvage Therapy | |
dc.subject | South Africa | |
dc.subject | Treatment Failure | |
dc.subject | Viral Load | |
dc.title | Virologic failure and second-line antiretroviral therapy in children in South Africa-the IeDEA Southern Africa collaboration | |
dc.type | Article |