Mood responses to COVID-19 : implications for family practice in South Africa
Date
2021-07
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
AOSIS
Abstract
The effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the mood responses of individuals is an important indicator of how society is coping with the pandemic. Characterising mood responses in a South African sample could prepare clinicians for possible presentations of mental health concerns in general practice. This study described mood responses during COVID-19 Alert Level 1. The sample of 641 participants who completed the Brunel Mood State Scale during November 2020 was drawn from primary healthcare and family medicine clinics and practices in Cape Town. Their mood response profile was described and compared with pre-COVID-19 norms. The mood profile represented an inverse iceberg profile, with mean scores deviating significantly from pre-COVID-19 norms across all six mood dimensions measured. The inverse iceberg profile had been associated with a range of psychopathologies, suggesting an increased risk of psychological disorders. The current profile of mood responses could alert clinicians to the possibility of increased mental health needs of patients. Patient reports of prolonged anxiety and fatigue, particularly when combined with low mood and low vigour, could signal the need for intervention or referral for further mental health support.
Description
CITATION: Van Wijk, C. & Majola, P. Z. 2021. Mood responses to COVID-19 : implications for family practice in South Africa. South African Family Practice, 63(1):a5285, doi:10.4102/safp.v63i1.5285.
The original publication is available at https://safpj.co.za
The original publication is available at https://safpj.co.za
Keywords
COVID-19 (diseases) -- Psychological aspects -- South Africa, COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020- -- Influence -- South Africa
Citation
Van Wijk, C. & Majola, P. Z. 2021. Mood responses to COVID-19 : implications for family practice in South Africa. South African Family Practice, 63(1):a5285, doi:10.4102/safp.v63i1.5285.