Effectiveness of private land conservation areas in maintaining natural land cover and biodiversity intactness

dc.contributor.authorShumba, Tafadzwaen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorDe Vos, Altaen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorBiggs, Reinette, 1979-en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorEsler, Karen J.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorAment, Judith M.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorClements, Hayley S.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-03T06:38:39Z
dc.date.available2020-02-03T06:38:39Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionCITATION: Shumba, T. et al. 2020. Effectiveness of private land conservation areas in maintaining natural land cover and biodiversity intactness. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22:e00935, doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00935.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://www.journals.elsevier.com/global-ecology-and-conservation
dc.description.abstractPrivate land conservation areas (PLCAs) are increasingly looked to for meeting the deficit left by state-owned protected areas in reaching global conservation targets. However, despite the increasing extent and recognition of PLCAs as a complementary conservation strategy, little research has been done to quantify their effectiveness; a critical consideration if they are to be counted towards international biodiversity conservation targets. The long history of PLCAs in South Africa provides an interesting case study to address this knowledge gap. Here, we quantified the effectiveness of South African PLCAs by comparing losses in natural land cover and biodiversity intactness within PLCAs with different levels of protection to that of unprotected control points. Points within PLCAs were matched with unprotected control points to test the prediction that if PLCAs offer effective protection, losses in natural land cover and biodiversity intactness would be significantly lower within their boundaries in comparison to unprotected controls exposed to similar conditions. Consequences of natural land cover loss on biodiversity intactness were thus assessed, thus advancing standard approaches for quantifying effectiveness. Between 1990 and 2013, PLCAs lost significantly less natural land cover (3%) and biodiversity intactness (2%) than matched unprotected areas (6% and 4%, respectively). Of the natural land cover lost within PLCAs, most was converted to cultivated land. Farms can support more species than other land uses (e.g. mines), a likely explanation for why losses in biodiversity intactness were less than losses in natural land cover. Contrary to the predicted pattern, effectiveness did not increase with level of protection; informal PLCAs with no legal protection had comparable natural land cover and biodiversity intactness retention to strictly protected PLCAs, with most losses recorded among PLCAs with moderate protection. This study provides the first national-scale evidence that PLCAs can be an effective mechanism for conserving natural land cover and biodiversity intactness, which is highly relevant given current discussions around their likely long-term biodiversity conservation capacity.en_ZA
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.format.extent11 pages
dc.identifier.citationShumba, T. et al. 2020. Effectiveness of private land conservation areas in maintaining natural land cover and biodiversity intactness. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22:e00935, doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00935.
dc.identifier.issn2351-9894 (online)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00935
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/107414
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyright
dc.subjectBiodiversity conservationen_ZA
dc.subjectPrivate land conservation areas -- Evaluationen_ZA
dc.subjectNatural areas -- Conservationen_ZA
dc.subjectLand cover -- Protectionen_ZA
dc.subjectLand cover -- Losses -- Preventionen_ZA
dc.titleEffectiveness of private land conservation areas in maintaining natural land cover and biodiversity intactnessen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
shumba_effectiveness_2020.pdf
Size:
849.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: