Tourists' perceptions and willingness to pay for the control of Opuntia stricta invasion in protected areas : a case study from South Africa

dc.contributor.authorNikodinoska, Natashaen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorFoxcroft, Llewellyn C.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorRouget, Mathieuen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorPaletto, Alessandroen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorNotaro, Sandraen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-24T11:41:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-25T17:07:23Z
dc.date.available2015-03-24T11:41:23Z
dc.date.available2021-08-25T17:07:23Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-15
dc.descriptionCITATION: Nikodinoska, N. et al. 2014. Tourists’ perceptions and willingness to pay for the control of Opuntia stricta invasion in protected areas: A case study from South Africa. Koedoe, 56(1). doi:10.4102/koedoe.v56i1.1214
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/index
dc.description.abstractInvasive alien plants have a long history of establishment in the national parks of South Africa. In particular, Opuntia stricta (sour prickly pear) has invaded several protected areas in the country, threatening the biodiversity conservation mandate of these conservation areas. This article focuses on the economic estimation of O. stricta’s negative impacts in protected areas by using Contingent Valuation surveys conducted amongst a sample of tourists in the Pilanesberg National Park (North West Parks and Tourism Board, South Africa). Tourists’ familiarity and awareness of selected invasive alien plants and their willingness to pay for the implementation of a control programme for O. stricta were assessed. The results show that many tourists are familiar with invasive alien plants and their (positive and negative) impacts and, in particular, perceived the presence of O. stricta to be negative, due to the impacts on aesthetics and recreation. Socio-demographic characteristics, as well as individual attitudes and biocentric beliefs, have an influence on the willingness to contribute financially to a control programme for O. stricta. The individual willingness to pay assessment found that the majority of respondents (78%) were willing to pay a higher entrance fee (an additional R57.30 or $7.00 per day) for a hypothetical programme to control the invasion of O. stricta in the Pilanesberg National Park. Conservation implications: The willingness of tourists to pay for O. stricta management provides useful insights in the decision-making process of park management. The results are encouraging, since, in general, tourists are aware of the problem and are in support of providing additional economic input for preventing future alien plant invasions.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1214
dc.format.extent8 pages
dc.identifier.citationNikodinoska, N. et al. 2014. Tourists’ perceptions and willingness to pay for the control of Opuntia stricta invasion in protected areas: A case study from South Africa. Koedoe, 56(1). doi:10.4102/koedoe.v56i1.1214en
dc.identifier.issn2071-0771 (online)en
dc.identifier.issn0075-6458 (print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.4102/koedoe.v56i1.1214
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/113872
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherAOSISen_ZA
dc.subjectInvasive alien plants -- National Parks -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectOpuntia stricta -- National Parks -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectPrickly pears -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectInvasive plants -- Biological controlen_ZA
dc.subjectInvasive plants -- Economic aspects -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectProtected areas -- Managementen_ZA
dc.titleTourists' perceptions and willingness to pay for the control of Opuntia stricta invasion in protected areas : a case study from South Africaen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Foxcroft_Koedoe_2014.pdf
Size:
547.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
164 B
Format:
Plain Text
Description: