A capabilities approach to remedies for systemic resource-related socioeconomic rights violations in South Africa

dc.contributor.authorVan der Berg, Shanelleen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-12T10:31:59Z
dc.date.available2021-07-12T10:31:59Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionCITATION: Van der Berg, S. 2019. A capabilities approach to remedies for systemic resource-related socioeconomic rights violations in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal, 19(1):290-316, doi:10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n1a14 .en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://www.ahrlj.up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.description.abstractThe judiciary plays a key role in holding the government accountable for its socio-economic policies. By adhering to certain tenets that underlie both South Africa's transformative Constitution and Sen and Nussbaum's capabilities approach, courts can promote the foundational values of dignity, equality and freedom, broaden participation and ensure accountability. Since government's priorities are most clearly reflected in its budgetary allocations, courts should apply a capabilities-based standard of proportionality review where it is claimed that a socioeconomic right has been violated due to disproportionate resource allocation. In this article, the focus shifts to the implications of adopting a capabilities approach at the remedial phase of adjudication. Given that the South African Constitution demands 'effective' relief where a constitutional right has been infringed, it is argued that efficacy can be assessed by a remedy's ability to realise the capabilities that form the content of the infringed socio-economic right. Furthermore, where socioeconomic rights are infringed upon on a systemic level through unreasonable resource allocation, key principles that inform a capabilities approach to adjudication can be incorporated into the design of structural interdicts to ensure lasting capability realisation and institutional reform. Where all these principles are observed, effective relief can ensue. Finally, the incorporation of these principles into remedial design can help mitigate separation of powers-based concerns that the judiciary lacks the institutional competence and legitimacy required to adjudicate complex, polycentric matters of government resource allocation.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://www.ahrlj.up.ac.za/van-der-berg-s
dc.description.versionPublisher's versionen_ZA
dc.format.extent27 pagesen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationVan Der Berg, S. 2019. A capabilities approach to remedies for systemic resource-related socioeconomic rights violations in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal, 19(1):290-316, doi:10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n1a14 en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1996-2096 (online)
dc.identifier.issn1609-073X (print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n1a14 
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/110706
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherPretoria University Law Pressen_ZA
dc.rights.holderAuthor retains copyrighten_ZA
dc.subjectEconomic rights -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectSocial rights -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectResponsive remediesen_ZA
dc.subjectSocial legislation -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.titleA capabilities approach to remedies for systemic resource-related socioeconomic rights violations in South Africaen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
vanderberg_capabilities_2019.pdf
Size:
185.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: