Certificate of need : dead and buried, or hibernating?

dc.contributor.author	De Roubaix, Malcolm	en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned	2011-03-18T14:56:58Z
dc.date.available	2011-03-18T14:56:58Z
dc.date.issued	2006
dc.description	CITATION: De Roubaix, M. 2006. Certificate of need : dead and buried, or hibernating? South African Medical Journal, 96(6):514-516.
dc.description	The original publication is available at http://www.samj.org.za
dc.description.abstract	On 2 May 2005, ten of the twelve chapters of the National Health Act (Act No. 61 of 2003) came into effect, generally with favourable reviews. I restrict myself to the motivation and ideology fundamental to Chapter 6 of the Draft Bill which (together with Chapter 8) was omitted in the Act, or rather, as the official government communiqué ominously asserted, ‘not yet proclaimed’. Chapter 6 deals among other things with the classification of health establishments as a precursor to the notorious Certificate of Need.
dc.description.version	Publisher’s version
dc.identifier.issn	2078-5135 (online)
dc.identifier.issn	0256-9574 (print)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/7105
dc.language.iso	en
dc.publisher	Health & Medical Publishing Group
dc.rights.holder	South African Medical Journal
dc.subject	South Africa. National Health Act, 2003	en_ZA
dc.subject	Public health laws -- South Africa	en_ZA
dc.title	Certificate of need : dead and buried, or hibernating?	en_ZA
dc.type	Article

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1