The application of Inglehart's Materialism/Postmaterialism index in non-industrialised countries : a critique
Date
2004
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Faculty of the Humanities, University of the Free State
Abstract
This article makes three central claims. The first is that the operationalisation of Ronald Inglehart’s “materialist/postmaterialist dimension” cannot be transported unchanged from the industrialised western context of its origin to the non-industrialised world. The second claim is that an important dimension of the current values analysis strategy of Taylor, Kotzé and others in South Africa is theoretically incoherent. These theorists expanded Inglehart’s dimension to include a “pre-materialist” cluster of values in order to deal with values which they find important but which are not covered in the materialist/postmaterialist dimension. However, this is intended to be a universal dimension and cannot be adapted in this way. The third claim is that one can learn much from the South African attempt to adapt the materialist/postmaterialist dimension. In fact, it points to the need for an analytical strategy appropriate to the socio-economic conditions of developing nations. Both minimal and more comprehensive changes are proposed.
Description
CITATION: Muller, H. 2004. The application of Inglehart's Materialism/Postmaterialism index in non-industrialised countries : a critique. Acta Academica, 36(1), doi:10.38140/aa.v36i1.823.
The original publication is available at https://journals.ufs.ac.za
The original publication is available at https://journals.ufs.ac.za
Keywords
Citation
Muller, H. 2004. The application of Inglehart's Materialism/Postmaterialism index in non-industrialised countries : a critique. Acta Academica, 36(1), doi:10.38140/aa.v36i1.823.