Evaluation of empirical equations to predict bridge pier scour in a non-cohesive bed under clear-water conditions

dc.contributor.authorVonkeman, J. K.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorBasson, G. R.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-14T09:01:17Z
dc.date.available2021-10-14T09:01:17Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionCITATION: Vonkeman, J. K. & Basson, G. R. 2019. Evaluation of empirical equations to predict bridge pier scour in a non-cohesive bed under clear-water conditions. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 61(2):2-20, doi:10.17159/2309-8775/2019/v61n2a1.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at http://www.scielo.org.za
dc.description.abstractENGLISH ABSTRACT: Pier scour has been cited as the main mechanism responsible for the failure of bridges spanning rivers. Despite extensive research since the 1950s, there is no universally agreed upon procedure to accurately predict the equilibrium scour depth. Experimental data was generated by 48 tests with four flows and three pier shapes to evaluate the capability of 30 empirical equations to predict the local scour depth. Fine sand and crushed peach pips were used to address the scaling challenges of the equations by means of an equivalent movability number. The equations yielded a wide range of mostly unreliable results, particularly for the non-cylindrical pier shapes. Nevertheless, the HEC-18 models are recommended, in conjunction with Shen et al (1969), and Ali and Karim (2002), because they rely on the pier Reynolds number, a parameter which is significant in the vortex formation. Prediction models taking the horseshoe vortex into consideration could offer better scour depth predictions. Field data was analysed to improve the HEC-18 equation with new factors for pier shape and armouring for different confidence intervals. The armouring factor is based on the particle Reynolds number as opposed to the widely adopted critical velocity, and achieves considerably less scatter about the line of equality despite under-predictions for the cylindrical piers. Alternatively, a diagram comparable to the Modified Liu Diagram has the potential to predict bridge pier scour even though the pier structure parameters are omitted. Further research and improved prediction models should be considered, particularly advanced numerical models which are becoming increasingly feasible.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1021-20192019000200001
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.format.extent19 pagesen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationVonkeman, J. K. & Basson, G. R. 2019. Evaluation of empirical equations to predict bridge pier scour in a non-cohesive bed under clear-water conditions. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 61(2):2-20, doi:10.17159/2309-8775/2019/v61n2a1
dc.identifier.issn2309-8775 (online)
dc.identifier.issn1021-2019 (print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.17159/2309-8775/2019/v61n2a1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/123226
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherSouth African Institution of Civil Engineeringen_ZA
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyrighten_ZA
dc.subjectScour (Hydraulic engineering)en_ZA
dc.subjectScour at bridgesen_ZA
dc.subjectBridges -- Foundations and piersen_ZA
dc.titleEvaluation of empirical equations to predict bridge pier scour in a non-cohesive bed under clear-water conditionsen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
vonkeman_evaluation_2019.pdf
Size:
1.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: