Pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (Review)
dc.contributor.author | Lourens, A. | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Kredo, T. | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | McCaul, M. | en_ZA |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-18T07:07:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-18T07:07:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Early thrombolysis for individuals experiencing a myocardial infarction is associated with better mortality and morbidity outcomes. While traditionally thrombolysis is given in hospital, pre-hospital thrombolysis is proposed as an effective intervention to save time and reduce mortality and morbidity in individuals with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Despite some evidence that prehospital thrombolysis may be delivered safely, there is a paucity of controlled trial data to indicate whether the timing of delivery can be effective in reducing key clinical outcomes. Objectives: To assess the morbidity and mortality of pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for STEMI. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/104450 | |
dc.language.iso | en_ZA | en_ZA |
dc.subject | thrombolysis | en_ZA |
dc.subject | myocardial infarction | en_ZA |
dc.title | Pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (Review) | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |