Work stress in two health systems : an international survey

dc.contributor.advisorLamprecht, Heinen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorDe Haan, Sebastian Hein Scott-Waringen_ZA
dc.contributor.otherStellenbosch University. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Dept. of Family and Emergency Medicine. Emergency Medicine.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-15T08:51:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-11T10:23:57Z
dc.date.available2017-11-15T08:51:45Z
dc.date.available2017-12-11T10:23:57Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.descriptionThesis (MFamMed)--Stellenbosch University, 2017.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractENGLISH SUMMARY : Introduction: High levels of occupational stress can cause health and performance issues within the specialty of emergency medicine (EM). These issues can lead to increased burnout and attrition from the profession. We examined workplace stress experiences for both trainees and certified EM specialists in settings where the specialty of EM is new (South Africa) and better established (Canada). Methods: An online cross-sectional survey of EM trainees and physicians in both countries was conducted using the validated Management Standards Indicator Tool (MSIT, Health and Safety Executive, UK). A 35-item questionnaire where each item was weighted on a five-point Lickert scale was sent that assesses six key domains of work related stress with lower scores indicative of higher stressors. Comparisons were made using means and 95% confidence intervals. Results: There were 89 South African, and 515 Canadian respondents. In Canada, specialists (n=396) had significantly higher Demands (2.6 (95%CI 2.6-2.7) vs. 3.0 (2.8-3.1)) and Manager Support stressors (3.3 (3.3-3.4) vs. 3.9 (3.6-4.0)) than trainees (n=36). Canadian trainees reported higher Role stressors (4.0 (3.9-4.1) vs. 4.2 (4.2-4.3)). In South Africa, trainees (n=39) had higher stressors than specialists (n=36) on Demands (2.2 (2.1-2.3) vs. 2.7 (2.5-2.8)), Control (2.6 (2.4-2.7) vs. 3.5 (3.3-3.7)), Role (3.6 (3.4-3.7) vs. 4.0 (3.7-4.3)) and Change (2.4 (2.2-2.6) vs. 3.0 (2.7-3.3)). South African trainees had significantly higher stressors on all domains than Canadian trainees. While South African specialists had lower Control stressors than Canadian counterparts, they had higher Peer Support and Relationship stressors. Conclusions: Risk factors for work-related stress are higher in all domains among South African EM trainees compared with Canadian trainees, and differ from South African EM specialists. Canadian EM trainees reported a lack of role clarity. Canadian specialists had lower work control, but better peer support and work relationships than SA specialists. We hope to further our research by identifying targeted interventions to help reduce or manage these disparities.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractAFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING : Geen opsomming beskikbaar.af_ZA
dc.format.extent72 pages ; illustrations, includes annexures
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/102549
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherStellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
dc.rights.holderStellenbosch University
dc.subjectEmergency medical personnel -- Job stress -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectEmergency medical personnel -- Job stress -- Canadaen_ZA
dc.subjectEmergency medical services -- Psychological aspectsen_ZA
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.titleWork stress in two health systems : an international surveyen_ZA
dc.typeThesisen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
dehaan_work_2017.pdf
Size:
1.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download thesis
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: