rhuIL-2 adjunctive therapy in multidrug resistant tuberculosis: A comparison of two treatment regimens and placebo
dc.contributor.author | Johnson B.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bekker L.-G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rickman R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Brown S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lesser M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ress S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Willcox P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Steyn L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kaplan G. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-15T16:18:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-05-15T16:18:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | |
dc.description.abstract | Setting: Low-dose recombinant human interleukin 2 (rhuIL-2) adjunctive immunotherapy in multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients. Objective: Evaluation of the effects of daily versus pulse-administered rhuIL-2 compared to placebo. Design: MDR-TB patients on best available antituberculous chemotherapy received rhuIL-2 for 30 consecutive days (daily therapy), or for 5 days followed by a 9-day 'rest', for three cycles (pulse therapy). Placebo control patients received diluent. The cumulative total dose of rhuIL-2 given to each patient in either rhuIL-2 treatment group was the same. Patient immunologic, microbiologic, and radiologic responses were compared. Results: The three treatment schedules induced different results. Immune activation was documented in patients receiving daily rhuIL-2 therapy. Numbers of CD25+ and CD56+ cells in the peripheral blood were increased in these patients, but not in patients receiving pulse rhuIL-2 or placebo. In addition, 5/8 (62%) patients receiving daily rhuIL-2 demonstrated reduced or cleared sputum bacterial load while only 2/7 (28%) pulse rhuIL-2 treated and 2/8 (25%) controls showed bacillary clearance. Chest radiographs of 7/12 (58%) patients receiving daily rhuIL-2 indicated significant improvement over 6 weeks. Only 2/9 (22%) pulse rhuIL-2-treated patients and 5/12 (42%) placebo controls showed radiologic improvement. Conclusion: Daily low dose rhuIL-2 adjunctive treatment stimulates immune activation and may enhance the antimicrobial response in MDR-TB. | |
dc.description.version | Article | |
dc.identifier.citation | Tubercle and Lung Disease | |
dc.identifier.citation | 78 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 3-4 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 09628479 | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1016/S0962-8479(97)90026-5 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/14594 | |
dc.subject | cd56 antigen | |
dc.subject | clofazimine | |
dc.subject | ethambutol | |
dc.subject | ethionamide | |
dc.subject | interleukin 2 receptor | |
dc.subject | isoniazid | |
dc.subject | kanamycin | |
dc.subject | ofloxacin | |
dc.subject | pyrazinamide | |
dc.subject | recombinant interleukin 2 | |
dc.subject | rifabutin | |
dc.subject | rifampicin | |
dc.subject | streptomycin | |
dc.subject | terizidone | |
dc.subject | thioacetazone | |
dc.subject | adult | |
dc.subject | article | |
dc.subject | bacterial count | |
dc.subject | clinical article | |
dc.subject | clinical trial | |
dc.subject | controlled study | |
dc.subject | drug efficacy | |
dc.subject | female | |
dc.subject | human | |
dc.subject | immunostimulation | |
dc.subject | intradermal drug administration | |
dc.subject | male | |
dc.subject | multidrug resistance | |
dc.subject | priority journal | |
dc.subject | sputum culture | |
dc.subject | thorax radiography | |
dc.subject | treatment outcome | |
dc.subject | tuberculosis | |
dc.subject | Adult | |
dc.subject | Antigens, CD56 | |
dc.subject | Antitubercular Agents | |
dc.subject | Chemotherapy, Adjuvant | |
dc.subject | Drug Administration Schedule | |
dc.subject | Female | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Immunophenotyping | |
dc.subject | Interleukin-2 | |
dc.subject | Lung | |
dc.subject | Male | |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject | Receptors, Interleukin-2 | |
dc.subject | Recombinant Proteins | |
dc.subject | Sputum | |
dc.subject | Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant | |
dc.title | rhuIL-2 adjunctive therapy in multidrug resistant tuberculosis: A comparison of two treatment regimens and placebo | |
dc.type | Article |