Determining relative adequacy in Biblical interpretation

dc.contributor.authorConradie, Ernst en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorJonker, Louis C.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-23T11:51:26Z
dc.date.available2013-01-23T11:51:26Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.descriptionCITATION: Conradie, E. M. & Jonker, L. C. 2001. Determining relative adequacy in Biblical interpretation. Scriptura, 78, doi:10.7833/78-0-695.en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://scriptura.journals.ac.za
dc.description.abstractPlurality is an inevitable and necessary result of Biblical interpretation. There can be no single fully adequate interpretation of any Biblical text. This is partly due to the polisemy inherent in the text itself, but also to the different historical, geographical, and ecclesial contexts within which the meaning of a text is continuously being appropriated. Interpretation is necessarily an ongoing task if this implies the need to embody the significance of the text in and for ever changing circumstances.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://scriptura.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/695
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.format.extent8 pages
dc.identifier.citationConradie, E. M. & Jonker, L. C. 2001. Determining relative adequacy in Biblical interpretation. Scriptura, 78, doi:10.7833/78-0-695.
dc.identifier.citation10.7833/78-0-695
dc.identifier.issn2305-445X (online)
dc.identifier.issn0254-1807 (print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/75077
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDepartment of Old and New Testament, Stellenbosch University
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyright
dc.subject.lcshBible -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.en_ZA
dc.titleDetermining relative adequacy in Biblical interpretationen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
conradie_determining_2001.pdf
Size:
4.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article