Male versus female condoms for contraception
| dc.contributor.author | Motaze, Nkengafac V. | en_ZA |
| dc.contributor.author | Okwundu, Charles I. | en_ZA |
| dc.contributor.author | Temfack, Elvis | en_ZA |
| dc.contributor.author | Mboudou, Emile | en_ZA |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-07T12:26:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-07-07T12:26:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-06-13 | |
| dc.description | CITATION: Motaze, N. V., Okwundu, C. I., Temfack, E. & Mboudou, E. 2013. Male versus female condoms for contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6. Art. No.: CD010579, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010579. | |
| dc.description | The original publication is available at http://www.cochranelibrary.com | |
| dc.description.abstract | The main objective of this review is to compare the female condom to the male condom as a method of contraception. | en |
| dc.description.uri | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010579/full | |
| dc.format.extent | 10 pages | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Motaze, N. V., Okwundu, C. I., Temfack, E. & Mboudou, E. 2013. Male versus female condoms for contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6. Art. No.: CD010579, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010579. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1469-493X (online) | |
| dc.identifier.other | doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010579 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/93463 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons | |
| dc.rights.holder | Authors retain copyright | |
| dc.subject | Contraception | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Condoms -- Reviews | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Female condoms | en_ZA |
| dc.title | Male versus female condoms for contraception | en_ZA |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- motaze_male_2013.pdf
- Size:
- 165.08 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Download article