Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater
dc.contributor.author | Strauss, Andre | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Dobrowsky, Penelope Heather | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Ndlovu, Thando | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Reyneke, Brandon | en_ZA |
dc.contributor.author | Khan, Wesaal | en_ZA |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-17T12:31:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-17T12:31:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-12-09 | |
dc.date.updated | 2016-12-09T17:03:19Z | |
dc.description | CITATION: Strauss, A., et al. 2016. Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater. BMC Microbiology, 16:289, doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0909-y. | en_ZA |
dc.description | The original publication is available at http://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com | en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Numerous pathogens and opportunistic pathogens have been detected in harvested rainwater. Developing countries, in particular, require time- and cost-effective treatment strategies to improve the quality of this water source. The primary aim of the current study was thus to compare solar pasteurization (SOPAS; 70 to 79 °C; 80 to 89 °C; and ≥90 °C) to solar disinfection (SODIS; 6 and 8 hrs) for their efficiency in reducing the level of microbial contamination in harvested rainwater. The chemical quality (anions and cations) of the SOPAS and SODIS treated and untreated rainwater samples were also monitored. Results: While the anion concentrations in all the samples were within drinking water guidelines, the concentrations of lead (Pb) and nickel (Ni) exceeded the guidelines in all the SOPAS samples. Additionally, the iron (Fe) concentrations in both the SODIS 6 and 8 hr samples were above the drinking water guidelines. A >99% reduction in Escherichia coli and heterotrophic bacteria counts was then obtained in the SOPAS and SODIS samples. Ethidium monoazide bromide quantitative polymerase chain reaction (EMA-qPCR) analysis revealed a 94.70% reduction in viable Legionella copy numbers in the SOPAS samples, while SODIS after 6 and 8 hrs yielded a 50.60% and 75.22% decrease, respectively. Similarly, a 99.61% reduction in viable Pseudomonas copy numbers was observed after SOPAS treatment, while SODIS after 6 and 8 hrs yielded a 47.27% and 58.31% decrease, respectively. Conclusion: While both the SOPAS and SODIS systems reduced the indicator counts to below the detection limit, EMA-qPCR analysis indicated that SOPAS treatment yielded a 2- and 3-log reduction in viable Legionella and Pseudomonas copy numbers, respectively. Additionally, SODIS after 8 hrs yielded a 2-log and 1-log reduction in Legionella and Pseudomonas copy numbers, respectively and could be considered as an alternative, cost-effective treatment method for harvested rainwater. | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | http://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12866-016-0909-y | |
dc.description.version | Publisher's version | en_ZA |
dc.format.extent | 16 pages : illustrations | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Strauss, A., et al. 2016. Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater. BMC Microbiology, 16:289, doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0909-y | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-2180 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0909-y | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/100473 | |
dc.language.iso | en_ZA | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en_ZA |
dc.rights.holder | Authors retain copyright | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Solar pasteurization | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Solar disinfection | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Harvested rainwater | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Microbial contamination | en_ZA |
dc.title | Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article |