Describing and comparing the availability of acute care resources to treat new onset stroke in different income settings : a self-reported survey of acute care providers at the 2016 international conference on emergency medicine

dc.contributor.advisorAllgaier, Rachelen_ZA
dc.contributor.advisorHendrikse, Clinten_ZA
dc.contributor.advisorBruijns, Stevan R.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorChunga, Ramadhan Mohameden_ZA
dc.contributor.otherStellenbosch University. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Dept. of Family and Emergency Medicine.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-23T12:02:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-11T06:44:39Z
dc.date.available2019-10-23T12:02:35Z
dc.date.available2019-12-11T06:44:39Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.descriptionThesis (MMed)--Stellenbosch University, 2019.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractENGLISH SUMMARY : Introduction: Stroke affects 15 million people annually and is responsible for 5 million deaths per annum globally. In contrast to the trend in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), stroke mortality is on the decline in high-income countries (HICs). Even though the availability of resources varies considerably by geographic region and across LMICs and HICs, evidence suggests that material resources in LMICs to implement recommendations from international guidelines are largely unmet. This study describes and compares the availability of resources to treat new-onset stroke in countries based on the World Bank’s gross national incomes, using recommendations of the American Heart Association and the American Stroke Association 2013 update. Methods: A self-reported cross-sectional survey was conducted of delegates that attended the April 2016 International Conference on Emergency Medicine using the web-based e-Survey client, Survey Monkey Inc. The survey assessed both pre-hospital and in-hospital settings and was piloted before implementation. Results: The survey was distributed and opened by 955 delegates and 382 (40%) responded. Respondents from LMICs reported significantly less access to a prehospital service (p<0.001) or a national emergency number (p<0.001). Access to specialist neurology services (p<0.001) and radiology services (p<0.001) were also significantly lower in LMICs. Conclusions: The striking finding from this study was that there was essentially very little difference between the responses between LMIC and HIC respondents with a few notable exceptions. The findings also propose a universal lack of adherence to the 2013 AHA/ASA stroke management guideline by both groups, in contrast to the good reported knowledge thereof. Carefully planned qualitative research is needed to identify the barriers to achieving the 2013 AHA/ASA recommendations.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractAFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING : Geen opsomming beskikbaar.af_ZA
dc.description.versionMasters
dc.format.extent63 pages ; illustrations, includes annexures
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/107040
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherStellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
dc.rights.holderStellenbosch University
dc.subjectCerebrovascular disease -- Treatmenten_ZA
dc.subjectResource allocationen_ZA
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.titleDescribing and comparing the availability of acute care resources to treat new onset stroke in different income settings : a self-reported survey of acute care providers at the 2016 international conference on emergency medicineen_ZA
dc.typeThesisen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
chunga_acute_2019.pdf
Size:
1.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: