ITEM VIEW

Revealing the social face of innovation

dc.contributor.authorHart, Tim G. B.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorRamoroka, Kgabo H.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Peter T.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorLetty, Brigid A.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-04T08:02:01Z
dc.date.available2016-05-04T08:02:01Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationHart, T.G.B., et al. 2015. Revealing the social face of innovation. South African Journal of Science, 111(9-10): 1-6, doi: 10.17159/sajs.2015/20140126en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1996-7489 (Online)
dc.identifier.issn0038-2353 (Print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi: 10.17159/sajs.2015/20140126
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/98964
dc.descriptionCITATION: Hart, T.G.B., et al. 2015. Revealing the social face of innovation. South African Journal of Science, 111(9-10): 1-6, doi: 10.17159/sajs.2015/20140126.en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at http://www.sajs.co.zaen_ZA
dc.description.abstractDespite the introduction of social innovation in the 1996 White Paper on Science and Technology, the concept of social innovation has not been actively implemented or even diffused outside of the policy arena in South Africa. Perceptions about what the concept of social innovation should encompass are contested and range from ideas of social welfare outcomes, public goods and a primary focus on the poor. More recently, the emphasis has been on inclusive development that embraces and supports the poor as innovators and which incorporates elements of social and economic development. While contestation in terminology persists, evidence from South Africa’s rural areas suggests that although there may be limited state intervention, hampered by structural constraints, and limited understanding of contemporary ideas about innovation and social innovation, local actors practise a variety of forms of social innovation. In most instances, the purpose is to improve social and economic well-being of the poor. Such innovation activities occur almost as widely and as often as strictly commercially oriented innovation activities. However, it is unclear from observed social innovation practices who should benefit from these practices (the poor or everyone), how (directly or indirectly) and when (immediately or gradually). It is suggested that extensive use of the actor-oriented sociological approach to understanding social dynamics in both science and development can provide a means of understanding the subtleties involved in innovation practices and its use should be adopted to address structural challenges within the National System of Innovation that mediate against the contribution of innovations to the poor for inclusive development.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.sajs.co.za/revealing-social-face-innovation/tim-g-b-hart-kgabo-h-ramoroka-peter-t-jacobs-brigid-letty
dc.format.extent6 pages
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherAcademy of Science of South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectSocial innovation -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectSocial problems -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectCommunity development -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectSouth Africa -- Social policyen_ZA
dc.subjectSocial planning -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.titleRevealing the social face of innovationen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyrighten_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW