ITEM VIEW

Rapid, minimally invasive adult voluntary male circumcision : a randomised trial of Unicirc, a novel disposable device

dc.contributor.authorMillard, P. S.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorWilson, H. R.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorGoldstuck, N. D.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorAnaso, Chibuzoen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-13T12:38:06Z
dc.date.available2016-01-13T12:38:06Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.identifier.citationMillard, P. S., Wilson, H. R., Goldstuck, N. D. & Anaso, C. 2014. Rapid, minimally invasive adult voluntary male circumcision: a randomised trial of Unicirc, a novel disposable device. South African Medical Journal, 104(1):52-57, doi:10.7196/SAMJ.7357.
dc.identifier.issn2078-5135 (online)
dc.identifier.issn0256-9574 (print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.7196/SAMJ.7357
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/98165
dc.descriptionCITATION: Millard, P. S., Wilson, H. R., Goldstuck, N. D. & Anaso, C. 2014. Rapid, minimally invasive adult voluntary male circumcision: a randomised trial of Unicirc, a novel disposable device. South African Medical Journal, 104(1):52-57, doi:10.7196/SAMJ.7357.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at http://www.samj.org.za
dc.description.abstractBackground. Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is a priority HIV preventive intervention. To facilitate VMMC scale-up, the World Health Organization is seeking circumcision techniques that are faster, easier, and safer than open surgical methods. Objective. To compare open surgical circumcision with suturing v. the Unicirc disposable instrument plus tissue adhesive. Methods. We conducted a non-blinded randomised controlled trial at an outpatient primary healthcare clinic in Cape Town, South Africa, with 2:1 allocation ratio of 150 male volunteers who were at least 18 years of age. Our primary outcome was intraoperative time and secondary outcomes were ease of performance, post-operative pain, adverse events, time to healing, patient satisfaction and cosmetic result. Results. The intraoperative time was less with the Unicirc/adhesive technique (median 13 v. 22.6 min, respectively; p<0.001). The intraoperative suturing rate was 17% using the Unicirc device. Other adverse events and wound healing outcomes were similar in both groups, but the cosmetic result was superior in the Unicirc group. Doctors found the Unicirc procedure easier to perform and preferred it to the open surgical technique. Conclusions. This study has important implications for the scale-up of VMMC services. Excising the foreskin with the Unicirc instrument and sealing the wound with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive in adults is quicker, easier to learn, and is potentially safer than open surgical VMMC. Further studies should be conducted with the optimised device. This new instrument has the potential to facilitate more rapid scale-up and save costs.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.samj.org.za/index.php/samj/article/view/7357
dc.format.extent6 pages
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherHealth & Medical Publishing Group
dc.subjectCircumcisionen_ZA
dc.subjectAids (Disease) -- Preventionen_ZA
dc.titleRapid, minimally invasive adult voluntary male circumcision : a randomised trial of Unicirc, a novel disposable deviceen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.rights.holderSouth African Medical Journal


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW