Corruption and its repercussions on employment, poverty and inequality : Rwanda and South Africa compared

Date
2019
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Lifescience Global
Abstract
Effective statecraft is founded on governance, planning and policy execution foundations that are historically derived and conditioned. In contemporary times, effective statecraft supposedly centres on ‘sustainable’ development paradigms and frameworks. This paper examines the connection between state construction and contemporary statecraft - refracted through anti-corruption policy and implementation - and their combined repercussions on employment, poverty and inequality. These include the challenges encountered by the proliferation of corruption, which many posit to be the ‘key enemy’ of good governance and, by extension, ‘sustainable’ development. Using Rwanda and South Africa as case studies, it is demonstrated that fighting corruption cannot be disconnected from power, political economy, the dynamics of public policy formulation, and the mechanics of policy implementation. This paper posits an association between specific types of patrimonialism, economic performance and service delivery with attendant consequences for employment generation, poverty eradication and reducing inequality.
Description
CITATION: Khan, F. & Pillay, P. 2019. Corruption and its repercussions on employment, poverty and inequality : Rwanda and South Africa compared. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8:1203-1212, doi:10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.104.
The original publication is available at https://lifescienceglobal.com/independent-journals/journal-of-reviews-on-global-economics/
Keywords
Corporate governance -- South Africa, Corporate governance -- South Africa, South Africa -- Politics and government, Rwanda -- Politics and government, Corruption -- South Africa -- Risk factors, Corruption -- Rwanda -- Risk assessment
Citation
Khan, F. & Pillay, P. 2019. Corruption and its repercussions on employment, poverty and inequality : Rwanda and South Africa compared. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8:1203-1212, doi:10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.104