ITEM VIEW

Managerial judging and alternative dispute resolution in Australia : an example for South Africa to emulate. part 1

dc.contributor.authorDe Vos, Wouter Le R.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorBroodryk, Theoen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T11:33:58Z
dc.date.available2019-08-14T11:33:58Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-04
dc.identifier.citationDe Vos, W. Le R. & Broodryk, T. 2017. Managerial judging and alternative dispute resolution in Australia : an example for South Africa to emulate? (part 1). Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, 2017(4):683 - 703.
dc.identifier.issn1996-2177 (online)
dc.identifier.issn0257-7747 (print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/106351
dc.descriptionCITATION: De Vos, W. Le R. & Broodryk, T. 2017. Managerial judging and alternative dispute resolution in Australia : an example for South Africa to emulate? (part 1). Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, 2017(4):683-703.en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://journals.co.za/content/journal/jlc_tsaren_ZA
dc.description.abstractThe English common law heritage of the states and territories in Australia (most of which were former British colonies) ensured that these different jurisdictions all embraced the adversarial system of civil litigation. Essentially, this meant that a passive role was accorded to the judge, especially during the pre-trial phase, while the parties, through their lawyers, played an active role during both the pre-trial and trial stages. By virtue of the principle of party control the parties were in charge of preparing their cases for trial and presenting their evidence and arguments at the trial. During the pre-trial phase the judge would react only if a party sought interlocutory relief, and even during the trial the judge assumed the role of a passive arbitrator, only ensuring that the lawyers conducted themselves in a seemly manner and complied with the “rules of the game”.en_ZA
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherJuta Lawen_ZA
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/106350
dc.subjectDispute resolution -- Australiaen_ZA
dc.subjectCivil law -- Australiaen_ZA
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectAlternative Disputeen_ZA
dc.subjectCivil litigation -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectCase management -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.titleManagerial judging and alternative dispute resolution in Australia : an example for South Africa to emulate. part 1en_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.rights.holderJuta Law


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW