ITEM VIEW

Can personal servitudes be worded in such a way that they are perpetual in nature and thus freely transferable and transmissable

dc.contributor.authorVan der Merwe, C. G.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-26T11:45:23Z
dc.date.available2018-09-26T11:45:23Z
dc.date.issued2013-01
dc.identifier.citationVan Der Merwe, C.G. 2013. Can personal servitudes be worded in such a way that they are perpetual in nature and thus freely transferable and transmissable?. Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, 2013(2):340-348.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1996-2207 (online)
dc.identifier.issn0257-7747 (print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/104505
dc.descriptionCITATION: Van Der Merwe, C.G. 2013. Can personal servitudes be worded in such a way that they are perpetual in nature and thus freely transferable and transmissable?. Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, 2013(2):340-348.en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://journals.co.za/content/journal/ju_tsaren_ZA
dc.description.abstractThe issues in Resnekov v Cohen (2012 1 SA 314 (WCC)) were whether a restrictive condition inserted into the title deeds of the servient property constituted a praedial or personal servitude, and if found to be personal, whether it could be made transferable to successors in title by the correct wording of the restrictive condition in title deeds of the servient property.en_ZA
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherJuta Lawen_ZA
dc.subjectServitudes -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectServitudes -- Casesen_ZA
dc.subjectReal property -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectSouth Africa -- Deeds Registries Act, 1937en_ZA
dc.titleCan personal servitudes be worded in such a way that they are perpetual in nature and thus freely transferable and transmissableen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.description.versionPublishers versionen_ZA
dc.rights.holderJuta Lawen_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW