Browsing by Author "Van Heerden, J."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemManagement of premature rupture of the membranes after 34 weeks' gestation : early versus delayed induction of labour(Health & Medical Publishing Group, 1996) Van Heerden, J.; Steyn, D. W.Objective. To determine the optimal way to manage patients with premature rupture of the membranes after 34 weeks' gestation. Design. A prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing immediate induction and delayed induction after 24-48 hours. Setting. Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town. Participants. Seventy consecutive patients with premature rupture of the membranes who presented at Tygerberg Hospital between July and October 1991. Main outcome measures. The two groups were compared with regard to infectious morbidity and antibiotic requirements in the mothers and babies, days spent in hospital, caesarean section rates, duration of labour and analgesic requirements. Results. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of infectious morbidity in either the mothers or the babies, the duration of labour or the caesarean section rates. Nine patients (26%) in the delayed induction group required analgesic treatment during labour versus 18 patients (52%) in the group that was induced immediately (P = 0.049; odds ratio = 0.327; 95% confidence limits = 0.014 - 0.0998). In the delayed induction group, 74% of the patients went into spontaneous labour during the conservative management period. Patients in the active group (immediate induction) had a statistically significant better chance of being discharged within 48 hours of admission (P = 0.028; odds ratio = 3.34; 95% confidence limits = 1.12 - 10.73). Conclusions. The management of patients with premature rupture of the membranes after 34 weeks should be decided upon according to the level of antepartum and neonatal care which is available at the particular unit. Where there is adequate neonatal support and pressure on bed occupancy, immediate induction of labour should be considered, while peripheral units should consider conservative management before referral of patients.
- ItemThe utility of hand-held mobile spirometer technology in a resource-constrained setting(Health & Medical Publishing Group, 2019) Du Plessis, E.; Swart, F.; Maree, D.; Heydenreich, J.; Van Heerden, J.; Esterhuizen, T. M.; Irusen, E. M.; Koegelenberg, C. F. N.Background. Mobile phone-linked spirometry technology has been designed specifically for evaluating lung function at primary care level. The Air-Smart Spirometer is the first mobile spirometer accepted in Europe for the screening of patients with chronic respiratory diseases. Objectives. To prospectively assess the accuracy of the device in measuring forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) in a South African population, and to investigate the ability of the device to detect obstructive ventilatory impairment. Methods. A total of 200 participants were randomly assigned to perform spirometry with either the mobile spirometer connected to a smartphone or the desktop spirometer first, followed by the other. The FEV1/FVC ratio as well as the absolute FEV1 and FVC measurements were compared, using each participant as their own control. A Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to measure the agreement between the two devices. We defined obstructive ventilatory impairment as FEV1/FVC <0.7 measured by desktop spirometry in order to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the Air-Smart Spirometer. Results. There was a strong correlation between the absolute FEV1 and FVC values and FEV1/FVC ratio measured with the mobile Air-Smart Spirometer and more conventional pulmonary function testing, with r=0.951, r=0.955 and r=0.898, respectively. The Air-Smart Spirometer had a sensitivity of 97.6%, specificity of 74.4%, PPV of 73.0% and NPV of 97.8% for obstructive ventilatory impairment. Conclusions. The mobile Air-Smart Spirometer compared well with conventional spirometry, making it an attractive and potentially affordable tool for screening purposes in a primary care setting. Moreover, it had a high sensitivity and NPV for obstructive ventilatory impairment.