Browsing by Author "Stapar, Dusica"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Is screening for microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes feasible in the Cape Town public sector primary care contect? A cost and consequence study
    (Medpharm Publications, 2013) Ibrahim, Hammed O.; Stapar, Dusica; Mash, Bob
    Background: Type 2 diabetes contributes significantly to the burden of disease in South Africa. Proteinuria is a marker for chronic kidney and cardiovascular disease. All guidelines recommend testing for microalbuminuria because intervention at this stage can prevent or delay the onset of disease. Currently, none of the community health centres (CHCs) in Cape Town test for microalbuminuria, and there are concerns about its costs and feasibility. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the practicality, costs and consequences of introducing a screening test for microalbuminuria into primary care. Design: Chronic care teams were trained to screen and treat all patients with diabetes (n = 1 675) over a one-year period. The fidelity of screening, costs and consequences was evaluated. Setting and subjects: Patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic care teams at two community health centres in the Cape Town Metro district. Outcome measures: Data to evaluate screening were extracted from the records of 342 randomly selected patients. Data to evaluate treatment were taken from the records of all 140 patients diagnosed with microalbuminuria. Results: Of the patients with diabetes, 14.6% already had macroalbuminuria. Of the eligible patients, 69.9% completed the screening process which led to a diagnosis of microalbuminuria in another 11.7%. Of those who were positively diagnosed, the opportunity to initiate angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors was missed in 20%, while 49.2% had ACE inhibitors initiated, or the dosage thereof increased. It would cost the health system an additional R1 463 to screen 100 patients and provide additional ACE inhibitor treatment for a year to the 12 that were diagnosed. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the feasibility of incorporating microalbuminuria testing into routine care. The costs involved were minimal, compared to the likely benefits of preventing end-stage renal failure and the costs of dialysis (estimated at R120 000 per year per patient).
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The quality of feedback from outpatient departments at referral hospitals to the primary care providers in the Western Cape : a descriptive survey
    (AOSIS, 2019) Mash, Bob; Steyn, Herma; Bello, Muideen; Von Pressentin, Klaus B.; Rossouw, Liezel; Hendricks, Gavin; Fouche, Germarie; Stapar, Dusica
    Background: Coordinating care for patients is a key characteristic of effective primary care. Family physicians in the Western Cape formed a research network to enable them to perform practical research on key questions from clinical practice. The initial question selected by the network focused on evaluating the quality of referrals to and feedback from outpatient departments at referral hospitals to primary care providers in the Western Cape. Methods: A descriptive survey combined quantitative data collected from the medical records with quantitative and qualitative data collected from the patients by questionnaire. Family physicians collected data on consecutive patients who had attended outpatient appointments in the last three months. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: Seven family physicians submitted data on 141 patients (41% male, 59% female; 46% metropolitan, 54% rural). Referrals were to district (18%), regional (28%) and tertiary hospitals (51%). Referral letters were predominantly biomedical. Written feedback was available in 39% of patients. In 32% of patients, doctors spent time obtaining feedback; the patient was the main source of information in 53% of cases, although many patients did not know what the hospital doctor thought was wrong (36%). The quality of referrals differed significantly by district and type of practitioner, while feedback differed significantly by level of hospital. Conclusion: Primary care providers did not obtain reliable feedback on specialist consultations at referral hospital outpatients. Attention must be given to barriers to care as well as communication, coordination and relationships across the primary–secondary interface.