Browsing by Author "Mpanza, Hlanzeka"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Critical Review of the multisector response to the National Strategy for the Prevention and Management of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) 2013-2017 in South Africa
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2019-04) Mpanza, Hlanzeka; Koen, Nelene; Sigge, G. O.; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Dept. of Global Health. Human Nutrition.
    ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) continues to increase in South Africa, with these diseases now accounting for 51% of all deaths. The food environment, and therefore consumption trends, are in a state of flux. Burgeoning urbanisation, persistently high unemployment, poverty and inequality in an environment in which food security is reliant on wage income inform widespread malnutrition. Evolving food systems and lifestyles have created a context in which households negotiate food prices and incomes to inform food acquisition strategies that aim to meet complex functional and aspirational needs in unevenly served urban and rural areas. It is in this environment that this review critically assessed the multi-sector response to the National Strategy for the Prevention and Management of Non-Communicable Diseases (2013 to 2017). The research project employed a desktop review through the application of a systematic search strategy. It aimed to identify actions by government, civil society, the food industry and the private sector, that addressed NCDs in South Africans over the age of 5 years between September 2011 and September 2018. Results indicate that the Department of Health has led in the implementation of structural and individual interventions, a number of which have been on a legislative basis. Most interventions have been in food reformulation, food labelling and school interventions. Nutrition education, fiscal measures and mass-media interventions were modest in number. Very few interventions in workplaces or physician counselling were identified. Whilst a number of collaborative and capacity building efforts were found, most appeared to be disjointed in practice. Almost no studies investigating funding for NCD interventions were identified. Three main themes emerged. Firstly, there is poor evidence of implementation, monitoring and evaluation of NCD interventions across sectors. Food control is fragmented, horizontally and vertically, with poor co-ordination of activities. Other than salt reformulation and some school activities, almost none of the interventions have been evaluated. This will make it difficult to draw any conclusions about their efficiency and effectiveness in the future. In addition, effective monitoring tools, inclusive of harmonised indicators, comprehensive local food composition tables as well as co-ordinated monitoring, evaluation and enforcement arrangements need urgent review. Secondly, significant gaps exist in research that is needed for policy recommendations, particularly around nationally representative dietary intake data, funding, less technocratic solutions drawn from communities living with NCDs as well as longitudinal data on food acquisition strategies. Very limited research studies were identified that investigated emerging at-risk communities including adolescent girls and women with higher incomes. Informal residence, whether urban or rural, seems like a risk factor for poor quality diets when dietary diversity scores and food expenditure are used as proxies. This is likely to be rooted in poverty or inequality. Thirdly, governance arrangements and coherence of actions need urgent review. Despite the call for multisectoral, multi-level working arrangements in the strategy and in theoretical policies, little evidence echoes recommended health-in-all policies in practice.