Doctoral Degrees (Chemical Engineering)

Permanent URI for this collection

https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/323

Browse

Browsing Doctoral Degrees (Chemical Engineering) by Author "Aboyade, Akinwale Olufemi"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cogasification of coal and biomass : impact on condensate and syngas production
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2012-03) Aboyade, Akinwale Olufemi; Gorgens, Johann F.; Meyer, Edson; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Engineering. Dept. of Process Engineering.
    ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Gasification provides a proven alternative to the dependence on petroleum for the production of high value products such as liquid fuels and chemicals. Syngas, the main product from gasification can be converted to fuels and chemicals via a number of possible synthesis processes. Coal and natural gas are currently the main feedstock used for syngas production. In South Africa (SA), Sasol operates the largest commercial coal-to-liquids conversion process in the world, based on updraft fixed bed gasification of low grade coal to syngas. Co-utilizing alternative and more sustainable feedstock (such as biomass and wastes) with coal in existing coal-based plants offers a realistic approach to reducing the costs and risks associated with setting up dedicated biomass conversion plants. An experimental and modelling investigation was performed to assess the impacts of co-gasifying two of the most commonly available agricultural wastes in SA (sugarcane bagasse and corn residue) with typical low grade SA coals, on the main products of updraft fixed bed gasification, i.e. liquid condensates and syngas. Condensates are produced in the pyrolysis section of the updraft gasifier, whereas syngas is a result of residual char conversion. An experimental set-up that simulates the pyrolysis section of the gasifier was employed to investigate the yield and composition of devolatilized products at industrially relevant conditions of 26 bars and 400-600°C. The results show that about 15 wt% of coal and 70 wt% of biomass are devolatilized during the pyrolysis process. The biomass derived condensates were determined to comprise of significantly higher quantities of oxygenates such as organic acids, phenols, ketones, and alcohols, whereas coal derived hydrocarbon condensates were dominated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, creosotes and phenols. Results of investigation into the influence of coal-biomass feedstock mix ratio on yields of products from pyrolysis show limited evidence of non-additive or synergistic behaviour on the overall distribution of solid, liquid and gas yields. On the other hand, in terms of the distribution of specific liquid phase hydrocarbons, there was significant evidence in favour of non-additive pyrolysis behaviour, as indicated by the non-additive yield distribution of specific chemicals. Synergistic trends could also be observed in the thermogravimetric (TGA) study of pyrolysis under kinetically controlled non-isothermal conditions. Model free and model fitting kinetic analysis of the TGA data revealed activation energies ranging between 94-212 kJ mol-1 for the biomass fuels and 147-377 kJ mol-1 for coal. Synergistic interactions may be linked to the increased presence of hydrogen in biomass fuels which partially saturates free radicals formed during earlier stages of devolatilization, thereby preventing secondary recombination reactions that would have produced chars, allowing for the increased formation of volatile species instead. Analysis of char obtained from the co-pyrolysis experiments revealed that the fixed carbon and volatile content of the blended chars is is proportional to the percentage of biomass and coal in the mixture. CO2 reactivity experiments on the chars showed that the addition of biomass to coal did not impose any kinetic limitation on the gasification of blended chars. The blended chars decomposed at approximately the same rate as when coal was gasified alone, even at higher biomass concentrations in the original feedstock blend. Based on these observations, a semi-empirical equilibrium based simulation of syngas production for co-gasification of coalbiomass blends at various mix ratios was developed using ASPEN Plus. The model showed that H2/CO ratio was relatively unaffected by biomass addition to the coal fuel mix, whereas syngas heating value and thermal efficiency were negatively affected. Subsequent evaluation of the production cost of syngas at biomass inputs ranging between 0-20 wt% of coal reflected the significant additional cost of pretreating biomass (3.3% of total capital investment). This resulted in co-gasification derived syngas production costs of ZAR146/tonne (ZAR12.6/GJ) at 80:20 coalbiomass feedstock ratio, compared to a baseline (coal only) cost of ZAR130/tonne (ZAR10.7/GJ). Sensitivity analysis that varied biomass costs from ZAR0 ZAR470 revealed that syngas production costs from co-gasification remained significantly higher than baseline costs, even at low to zero prices of the biomass feedstock. This remained the case even after taking account of a carbon tax of up to ZAR117/tCO2. However, for range of carbon tax values suggested by the SA treasury (ZAR70 tCO2 to ZAR200 tCO2), the avoided carbon tax due to co-feeding biomass can offset between 40-96% of the specific retrofitting cost at 80:20 coal-biomass feedstock mass ratio. In summary, this dissertation has showed that in addition to the widely recognized problems of ash fouling and sintering, co-feeding of biomass in existing coal based updraft gasification plants poses some challenges in terms of impacts on condensates and syngas quality, and production costs. Further research is required to investigate the potential in ameliorating some of these impacts by developing new high value product streams (such as acetic acid) from the significant fraction of condensates derived from biomass.