ITEM VIEW

Evaluation of minimum pressure head during peak flow as design criterion for water distribution systems

dc.contributor.advisorJacobs, H. E.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorStrijdom, J. L.en_ZA
dc.contributor.otherStellenbosch University. Faculty of Engineering. Dept. of Civil Engineering.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-09T15:08:18Z
dc.date.available2016-03-09T15:08:18Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/98840
dc.descriptionThesis (MEng)--Stellenbosch University, 2016.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractENGLISH ABSTRACT: One of the factors that drives infrastructure cost for water distribution systems (WDS), whether it being the cost of newly designed systems or the cost for maintaining and upgrading existing systems, is the hydraulic design criterion. The South African civil engineering fraternity has generally grown to accept the design criterion for water distribution systems as providing a minimum residual pressure head (MPH) of 24m at the most critical node in the system under theoretical peak demand conditions. Previous studies have indicated that the above criterion is relatively stringent, especially due to the fact that theoretical peak factors used in design to simulate the peak demand condition are often too conservative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the criterion with the focus on the MPH value of 24m employed as a guideline in South Africa. As part of the study, current hydraulic models of existing South African WDSs were evaluated. In total, 71 towns located within 17 municipalities were included in this study. A total of 52 hydraulic models comprising a total of 539 388 modelled nodes were analysed. The number of nodes experiencing pressures below 24m was determined and the time spent at pressures under 24m was assessed. Furthermore, the consequences of nodal pressures decreasing to below the minimum local standards were investigated. The results of the study confirmed previous findings that the current design criterion of 24m is too stringent and recommendations were made for water-providing authorities to relax the current design criterion. Three alternatives for a relaxed criterion were proposed.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractAFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Geen opsomming beskikbaaraf_ZA
dc.format.extentix, 136 pagesen_ZA
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherStellenbosch : Stellenbosch Universityen_ZA
dc.subjectWater -- Distribution -- Designen_ZA
dc.subjectWater-supply engineeringen_ZA
dc.subjectWater -- Distribution -- Systemsen_ZA
dc.subjectUCTDen_ZA
dc.subjectWater -- High pressure (Engineering)en_ZA
dc.subjectPressure -- Measurementen_ZA
dc.titleEvaluation of minimum pressure head during peak flow as design criterion for water distribution systemsen_ZA
dc.typeThesisen_ZA
dc.rights.holderStellenbosch Universityen_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW