ITEM VIEW

Substantive reasoning in administrative-law adjudication

dc.contributor.authorQuinot, G.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-11T00:37:16Z
dc.date.available2012-08-11T00:37:16Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationQuinot, G. 2010. Substantive reasoning in administrative-law adjudication. Constitutional Court Review, 3:111–139.en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/46333
dc.descriptionCITATION: Quinot, G. 2010. Substantive reasoning in administrative-law adjudication. Constitutional Court Review, 3:111–139.en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at http://www.constitutionalcourtreview.co.zaen_ZA
dc.description.abstractOne of the main characteristics of constitutional transformation in South Africa is what Etienne Mureinik calls the shift towards a culture of justification in which 'every exercise of power is expected to be justified'.1 He argues that within such a culture, constitutional rights 'are standards of justification - standards against which to measure the justification of the decisions challenged under them'.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.constitutionalcourtreview.co.za/index.php/previous-volumes-of-ccr/
dc.format.extent23 pagesen_ZA
dc.publisherConstitutional Court Reviewen_ZA
dc.publisherJuta Lawen_ZA
dc.subjectConstitutional law -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectAdministrative procedure -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectAdministrative law -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectSubstantive lawen_ZA
dc.titleSubstantive reasoning in administrative-law adjudicationen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.description.versionPost-printen_ZA
dc.rights.holderJuta Lawen_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW