ITEM VIEW

Evaluating ‘homegrown’ research networks in Africa

dc.contributor.authorAdelle, Camillaen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorElema, Nicoen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorChakauy, Erecken_ZA
dc.contributor.authorBenson, Daviden_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-07T09:24:40Z
dc.date.available2020-02-07T09:24:40Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationAdelle, C., et al. 2019. Evaluating homegrown research networks in Africa. South African Journal of Science, 114(3/4), Art. #2017-0070, doi:10.17159/sajs.2018/20170070
dc.identifier.issn1996-7489 (online)
dc.identifier.issn0038-2353 (print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.17159/sajs.2018/20170070
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/107450
dc.descriptionCITATION: Adelle, C., et al. 2019. Evaluating homegrown research networks in Africa. South African Journal of Science, 114(3/4), Art. #2017-0070, doi:10.17159/sajs.2018/20170070.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at http://sajs.co.za
dc.description.abstractAttempts to improve the policy environment have led to a growing pressure on governments in Africa to embark on policymaking that is more evidence based and considers a wide spectrum of scientific and indigenous knowledge. Local – or ‘homegrown’ – research networks on the continent can help strengthen the role of scientific knowledge in policymaking by increasing the capacity of researchers and by enhancing the visibility and communication of the research produced. While a large number of regional and sub-regional research networks have sprung up in Africa, the mere existence of networks does not guarantee their success. In reality, the impact of research networks on the science–policy interface depends on how well the networks operate in practice. We present a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of research networks in a way that is comparable across networks. The evaluation framework was used to evaluate two sub-regional research networks: the NEPAD Southern African Networks of Water Centres of Excellence (SANWACTE) and the NEPAD Southern African Network for Biosciences (SANBio). The evaluation revealed some shared constraints limiting the effectiveness of both networks, including uneven regional representation, asymmetry between network members, and difficulties in securing sufficient, diverse and sustainable resources. Further research into network design and funding models is suggested in order to enhance the role of these networks in providing locally appropriate knowledge for policymaking on the continent.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://www.sajs.co.za/article/view/4814
dc.format.extent7 pages
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherAcademy of Science of South Africa
dc.subjectResearch networksen_ZA
dc.titleEvaluating ‘homegrown’ research networks in Africaen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyright


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW