ITEM VIEW

Ethical concerns in the debate about pediatric vaccinations, with special reference to MMR (Mumps, Measles and Rubella)

dc.contributor.advisorVan Niekerk, Anton A.en_ZA
dc.contributor.advisorHorn, Lynen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorBester, Johan Christiaanen_ZA
dc.contributor.otherStellenbosch University. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. Dept. of Philosophy.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-22T13:12:09Z
dc.date.available2016-12-22T13:12:09Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/100073
dc.descriptionThesis (PhD)--Stellenbosch University, 2016.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractENGLISH ABSTRACT: This dissertation examines the ethical aspects of vaccination in children by focusing on vaccination against measles using the MMR vaccine. Applying a principlist ethical framework to the relevant medical and scientific facts, I articulate two ethical principles or action guides that can be used to formulate obligations resting on persons or institutions, as well as to guide measles vaccination policy. These ethical action guides are: (1) All children eligible for measles vaccination should be vaccinated against measles, at least to the point of sustained measles elimination. (2) Respect for parental decision-making and the parent-child relationship guide the response to parental vaccine refusals. Ethical action guide (1) describes the obligations of those who stand in significant relationships with children and of the just society – to protect children against measles using vaccination. Action guide (2) guides the individual and societal response to vaccine refusal, describing morally important considerations that should be kept in mind when responding to vaccine refusal. The dissertation proceeds as follows. First, the introductory chapter examines ethical tensions regarding measles vaccination in children, and identifies some deficiencies in the existing literature. Next, two chapters provide an overview of the scientific and medical facts regarding measles and MMR vaccination. Third, the principlist framework of Beauchamp and Childress is defended as an appropriate ethical framework for analysis of the problematic. Fourth, the individual case of measles vaccination is considered, using a medical decision-making framework based in the principlist approach. Fifth, the obligations of the just society with regards to measles vaccination is considered, using different conceptions of justice in turn. In the last section of this work, it is argued that action guides (1) and (2) bring all four principles into balance, a state of reflective equilibrium, and various ethical obligations and policy suggestions are derived from these two action guides.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractAFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Geen opsomming beskikbaaraf_ZA
dc.format.extent286 pages : illustrationsen_ZA
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherStellenbosch : Stellenbosch Universityen_ZA
dc.subjectRubella vaccinesen_ZA
dc.subjectMeasles vaccineen_ZA
dc.subjectMedical ethicsen_ZA
dc.subjectMumpsen_ZA
dc.subjectUCTDen_ZA
dc.subjectVaccination of infantsen_ZA
dc.titleEthical concerns in the debate about pediatric vaccinations, with special reference to MMR (Mumps, Measles and Rubella)en_ZA
dc.typeThesisen_ZA
dc.rights.holderStellenbosch Universityen_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW