Masters Degrees (Obstetrics and Gynaecology)
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Masters Degrees (Obstetrics and Gynaecology) by Subject "Acom"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemA comparative review of the outcomes of two different perinatal mortality classification systems at an Obstetric unit in Cape Town, South Africa(Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2012-12) Siebritz, Mark; Steyn, Daniel Wilhelm; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Background The annual burden of stillbirths is estimated to be more than 3 million deaths globally. Depending on the perinatal classification used, up to two thirds of deaths are reported as unknown.Gardosi, et al (2006) developed the ReCoDe system, which identified the relevant condition at the time of death in utero. The system aims to identify what went wrong in utero, without necessarily indentifying why fetal demise occurred. With comparison to the conventional Wigglesworth classification, the authors were able to reduce the number of unexplained stillbirths from 66.2% to 15.2%. The Perinatal Problem Identification Program (PPIP) is the nationally implemented perinatal classification system in South Africa. The PPIP database recorded approximately 660 000 births from the 1st January 2006 until 31st December 2007. This reflects approximately 40% of all births in health institutions in South Africa during this time period. There were 11742 stillbirths recorded in on the PPIP database for this two year period.Unexplained stillbirths formed 24% of the total perinatal deaths. The Saving Babies Report 2006-2007 has suggested that funding andresearch resources be directed to identifying the causes of deaths in this group. Objective: Our primary objective was to compare the outcomes of the PPIP to the ReCoDe classification system developed by Gardosi, with special attention as to reducing the number of unexplained stillbirths. Methods: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study on the perinatal deaths occurring at or presenting to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa, for the time period extending from 01 January 2008 to 31 December 2008. A weekly Perinatal Mortality Audit meeting (PNM) is held at Tygerberg Hospital. In attendance at these meetings are General obstetricians, Fetal-maternal specialists, Neonatologists, Pathologists, a Geneticist, Obstetric and Paediatric Registrars. Relevant clinical details are summarised from clinical notes and Perinatal Losses data forms. These forms are specific to Tygerberg Hospital and completed by the attending doctor at first consultation. Placental histology and post-mortem examination would have been performed in certain cases as per the departmental protocol. All perinatal deaths, both stillborn and neonatal deaths weighing more than 499g, are discussed at this forum and consensus then reached on a primary and final cause of death. This information is then entered into the PPIP database, along with any identifiable avoidable factors.The investigators separately reviewed the information available from the Perinatal Losses and the PIPP V2.2 data capture forms and then reclassified each stillbirth according to the ReCoDe hierarchal system Results: We studied the data sheets of 406 stillbirths of babies of whom the deaths had been previously classified according to the PPIP classification. The median maternal age was 25.65 years (range 14 – 45) while the median birth weight was 1127 grams (range 500 – 4100).The vast majority of these stillbirths occurred in singleton pregnancies and are also classified as extremely low birth weight. The three major causes of stillbirth over the study period were antepartum haemorrhage (24.4%), hypertensive disorders (22.4%) and spontaneous preterm labour (11.1%). Within the ReCoDe classification, the leading categories were in the placental group (33.2%), fetal group (21.6%) and the maternal group (20%). The unexplained group (PPIP IUD group), from the index study constitutes 8.1% (33 of 406) of cases, while the number of unclassified stillbirths in the primary ReCoDe classification accounted for 15% (60 of 406) of the total. The main reasons for this difference is that ReCoDe does not incorporate preterm labour as a cause, and uses customised growth charts for identifying fetal growth restriction. Conclusion: PPIP remains the gold standard in Perinatal Audit in South Africa.We would recommend that ReCoDe be evaluated prospectively, alongside the established PPIP system, to better compare their performance outcomes. The development of customized fetal growth potential charts relevant to the local population should be explored. The Perinatal Losses data capture form should be revised to be more comprehensive and relevant.