Browsing by Author "Fisher, Peter"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemCarcass and meat quality characteristics of three halothane genotypes in pigs(Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 1995) Fisher, Peter; Mellett, F. D.; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of AgriSciences. Dept. of Animal Science.ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The object of this study was to determine the effect of the halothane gene in pigs on certain production, carcass, meat and processed meat characteristics. Fifty nine (gilts = 25, castrates = 34) Landrace x Large white pigs of three halothane genotypes (NN = 31, Nn = 17, nn = 11) were raised under commercial conditions from 27 kg to 86 kg live weight. Variables measured during this period were days to slaughter and ADG. Upon reaching slaughter weight (86 kg) the pigs were transported to a commercial abattoir and slaughtered and classified according to factory procedures. Variables measured at the classification point were pH i, carcass length, warm carcass weight, fat thickness, meat depth and percentage predicted lean yield. After a 24 h cooling period the carcases were weighed, pH24 measured, cut to factory specifications and samples of the loin removed to determine drip loss. Certain portions (left hand side ham and back) of the carcass were removed, deboned and frozen for further processing. The backs and hams were defrosted after all the pigs were slaughtered. The backs were used to manufacture back bacon according to commercial procedures followed in the factory. This consists of brine injection, immersion in brine for 24 h, smoking and tempering or cooling. Weights of the individual samples (n = 59) were recorded before and after each of the processes mentioned. The deboned hams were grouped according to genotype and minced using a 20 mm mincerplate. Spices, preservatives and ice water were added to the minced meat and tumbled for 30 min to enhance the water binding potential of the meat. The ham mixture of each genotype was canned (20 cans/genotype), weighed and sterilized. After a cooling period the hams were removed from the cans, residual water drained off and the weight of each sample determined. Samples (n = 59) removed from the processed backs were used to determine chemical composition. Moisture content of the samples were determined by method of freeze drying. The dried samples were then analyzed for protein content (Kjeldahl), fat content (ether extraction) and sodium content (chromatography). The variables were analyzed in a two way classification model using the method of least squares to estimate differences between means. Correlations etween variables and multiple linear regression equations for certain dependent variables were also calculated. Interaction between sex and genotype for certain variables (days to slaughter, ADG, carcass length, percentage bacon yield) were discounted due to unalterability of the castrate:gilt ratio (days to slaughter, ADG, carcass length) or due to low significant values for sex in the model (percentage bacon yield). The presence of the halothane gene in homozygous form (nn) caused enhanced growth rate (days to slaughter, ADG). The nn pigs grew significantly (P < 0.05) faster than the NN- and Nn pigs during the growth (days to slaughter) phase (NN = 81.2, Nn = 84.6 and nn = 74.1). No significant differences between the genotypes for ADG were observed (NN = 0.729, Nn = 0.710 and nn = 0.765). Most of the carcass and meat quality characteristics did show statistically significant differences. No differences in the means for percentage chilling loss (NN = 4.4, Nn = 4.7 and nn = 5.2) and pH₂₄ (NN = 5.87, Nn = 5.81 and nn = 5.80) were found. The correlations between pH₁ and pH₂₄ (r = 0.27, P < 0.05) and drip loss (r = -0.39, P < 0.05) were significant. Percentage drip loss differed significantly (P < 0.05) between all three genotypes (NN = 1.69, Nn = 2.39 and nn = 1.06). Fat thickness (NN = 20.0, Nn = 18.8 and nn = 26.1), meat depth (NN = 50.9, Nn = 52.4 and nn = 46.8) and percentage predicted lean yield (NN = 66.1, Nn = 66.7 and nn = 63.0) differed significantly (P < 0.05 for meat depth, P < 0.001 for fat thickness and percentage predicted lean yield) between nn and NN as well as Nn, with no differences between NN and Nn, ruling out the incorporation of this gene and its proposed advantages. Correlations between drip loss and days to slaughter (growth phase) (r = 0.47, P < 0.001) and ADG (r = -0.38, P < 0.05) were significant. The processed meat (back bacon) only showed significant (P < 0.05) differences between Nn and nn for percentage pumped yield (NN = 9.7, Nn = 8.1 and nn = 12.6). Percentage moisture loss differed (P < 0.001) significantly between nn and NN as well as Nn, with no differences between NN and Nn (NN = 2.5, Nn = 1.2 and nn = 7.7). There were no differences in means for percentage bacon yield (NN = 7.2, Nn = 6.9 and nn = 4.8). The chemical composition of the analyzed samples showed significant (P < 0.05) differences between NN and nn for percentage protein (NN = 72.4, Nn = 71.6 and nn = 69.1) and sodium concentration (mg.kg·¹ DM) (NN = 12096, Nn = 12477 and nn = 13446). Percentage moisture differed (P < 0.05) between Nn and NN as well as nn (NN = 50.2, Nn = 44.8 and nn = 49.4). Percentage fat in the samples did not differ significantly (NN = 5.9, Nn = 5.7 and nn = 7.6). None of the multiple regressions . calculated were sufficiently accurate to be of any use as a predictive model. The incorporation of the halothane gene in pig production under South African production and processing conditions seems to have no real benefits for the producer, processor and consumer alike and the exclusion thereof in breeding programs is strongly recommended.