Reflections on Hans-Georg Gadamer's "Wirkungsgeschichte" [Opmerkings oor Hans-Georg Gadamer se begrip van die " Wirkungsgeschichte"]

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorFouche H.L.
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-15T16:02:30Z
dc.date.available2011-05-15T16:02:30Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.description.abstractHans-Georg Gadamer's contribution to hermencutics can be summarized in a nutshell in his thesis that there is a "wirkungsgeschichtliche" dimension in all understanding. In this article I make four remarks on the meaning of this concept. Firstly: the universal claim of Gadamer docs not claim to describe the totality of understanding, but only an essential and forgotten dimension. Secondly: there are three ascending perspectives on art, tradition and speaking that constitute together the Wirkungsgeschichte. Every one of them demonstrates that understanding is not primarily an action of objectification, but a happening of participation. Thirdly: there are similar thinking patterns by different philosophers that demonstrate that Gadamer's concept of the Wirkungsgeschichte is not so new and strange. Lastly: Gadamer's use of Aristotle's concept of phronesis or judgement (practical reasoning) is the concretization of the Wirkungsgeschichte and his ereat contribution to hermeneutics.
dc.description.versionArticle
dc.identifier.citationSouth African Journal of Philosophy
dc.identifier.citation21
dc.identifier.citation4
dc.identifier.issn2580136
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/12500
dc.titleReflections on Hans-Georg Gadamer's "Wirkungsgeschichte" [Opmerkings oor Hans-Georg Gadamer se begrip van die " Wirkungsgeschichte"]
dc.typeArticle
Files
Collections
Stellenbosch University - Scopus Publications