Paying the high price of active management : a new look at unit trust fees

dc.contributor.authorJanse van Rensburg, C.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorKrige, J. D.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-02T14:08:32Z
dc.date.available2019-10-02T14:08:32Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionCITATION: Van Rensburg, C. J. & Krige, J. D. 2018. Paying the high price of active management : a new look at unit trust fees. Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics, 42(1):23-40.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://journals.co.za
dc.description.abstractThis study attempts to allocate the fund management expenses of actively managed South African general equity unit trusts between active and passive management portions, thereby calculating the implicit cost of active management. The active expense ratio of a unit trust can be calculated by using the published total expense ratio (TER) of the unit trust, its correlation relative to its benchmark and the expense ratio of a comparable exchange traded fund (ETF) tracking the benchmark of the unit trust. This study focuses on actively managed South African equity unit trusts available to the retail investor for the period March 2007 to February 2015. The active expense ratios of these unit trusts were calculated on the basis of a three-, five- and eight-year analysis period. It was found that the mean active expense ratios of the South African unit trust sample amounted to 4,14%, 4,29% and 4,25% respectively in the case of the three-, five- and eight-year periods. The comparable mean reported TERs amounted to 1,60%, 1,61% and 1,61% respectively. Thus the mean active expense ratio is more than 150% higher than the comparable mean reported TER in each period. A similar study was conducted by Miller (2010), investigating the active expense ratios of actively managed large cap American unit trusts. He found that the mean active expense ratio was 6.44%, compared with a mean TER of 1.20%. However, due to a higher degree of active management being employed by South African managers, the active expense ratios are lower than those of the American counterparts.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://journals.co.za/content/journal/10520/EJC-e7cee9c6a?fromSearch=true
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.format.extent18 pages ; illustrations
dc.identifier.citationVan Rensburg, C. J. & Krige, J. D. 2018. Paying the high price of active management : a new look at unit trust fees. Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics, 42(1):23-40
dc.identifier.issn0379-6205 (print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/106569
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherBureau for Economic Research
dc.rights.holderBureau for Economic Research
dc.subjectMutual funds -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectUnit trusts -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectPortfolio management -- Costs -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.titlePaying the high price of active management : a new look at unit trust feesen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
vanrensburg_paying_2018.pdf
Size:
509.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: