Can computed tomographic angiography accurately exclude digestive tract injury after penetrating cervical trauma?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMaritz, J. P. B.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorBagadia, A.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorLubbe, J. A.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-24T08:11:33Z
dc.date.available2022-03-24T08:11:33Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.descriptionCITATION: Maritz, J. P. B., Bagadia, A. & Lubbe, J. A. 2020. Can computed tomographic angiography accurately exclude digestive tract injury after penetrating cervical trauma? South African Journal of Surgery, 58(4):192-198, doi:10.17159/2078-5151/2020/v58n4a3159.en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at: http://www.scielo.org.za
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Multislice computed tomographic angiography (MCTA) has become the method of choice to screen for arterial injury in penetrating cervical trauma (PCT). There is, however, limited knowledge on its accuracy in terms of digestive tract injury (DTI). Currently, our unit liberally employs both computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and contrast swallow for platysma breaching penetrating neck injuries. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of specific computed tomography findings in the diagnosis of DTI after PCT. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all consecutive patients with PCT who had undergone MCTA that presented at a single, tertiary, high-volume trauma centre from January 2013 until December 2015. Blinded radiological review of 140 MCTA investigations (33 in the injury group and 107 in the control group) was performed in order to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of trajectory, air, and conventional MCTA signs in the diagnosis of DTI after PCT. RESULTS: Over the study period, 906 patients presenting with PCT had undergone MCTA and a total of 33 patients (3.6%) had confirmed DTI on aggregate gold standard of diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of MCTA for detecting DTI was 100%, 65.4%, 47.1%, and 100%, respectively. No injuries were missed on MCTA. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that DTI can be safely excluded by means of careful assessment of specific signs on CTA in patients presenting after PCT, obviating the need for further investigation.en_ZA
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.format.extent7 pagesen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationMaritz, J. P. B., Bagadia, A. & Lubbe, J. A. 2020. Can computed tomographic angiography accurately exclude digestive tract injury after penetrating cervical trauma? South African Journal of Surgery, 58(4):192-198, doi:10.17159/2078-5151/2020/v58n4a3159.
dc.identifier.issn2078-5151 (online)
dc.identifier.issn0038-2361 (print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.17159/2078-5151/2020/v58n4a3159
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/124356
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherMedpharmen_ZA
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyrighten_ZA
dc.subjectComputed tomographyen_ZA
dc.subjectCTAen_ZA
dc.subjectDigestive tract injuryen_ZA
dc.subjectOesophagusen_ZA
dc.subjectPharynxen_ZA
dc.subjectPenetrating traumaen_ZA
dc.titleCan computed tomographic angiography accurately exclude digestive tract injury after penetrating cervical trauma?en_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
maritz_computed_2020.pdf
Size:
395.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Research Articles (Surgery)